Pure Energy Minerals Ltd (PE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pure Energy Minerals Ltd (PE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$5.28K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$158.17K) in one year. Check Pure Energy Minerals Ltd (PE) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Pure Energy Minerals Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Pure Energy Minerals Ltd across 24 annual periods. Check how high is Pure Energy Minerals Ltd's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Pure Energy Minerals Ltd (2001–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pure Energy Minerals Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see PE cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.49x | CA$188.12K | CA$387.84K | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2023 | 0.78x | CA$141.46K | CA$182.30K | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2022 | 0.61x | CA$95.56K | CA$157.85K | ▲ +198.3% |
| 2021 | -0.62x | CA$-182.82K | CA$296.72K | ▲ +60.8% |
| 2020 | -1.57x | CA$-435.05K | CA$276.88K | ▼ -18.4% |
| 2019 | -1.33x | CA$-609.28K | CA$459.30K | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2018 | -4.24x | CA$-2.27 Million | CA$536.32K | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2017 | -6.84x | CA$-2.42 Million | CA$354.58K | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2016 | -4.47x | CA$-1.79 Million | CA$401.46K | ▲ +57.6% |
| 2015 | -10.53x | CA$-1.28 Million | CA$121.67K | ▼ -5251.6% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | CA$43.66K | CA$213.68K | ▲ +102.3% |
| 2013 | -9.02x | CA$-740.21K | CA$82.03K | ▲ +64.1% |
| 2012 | -25.11x | CA$-1.05 Million | CA$41.87K | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2011 | -18.57x | CA$-1.34 Million | CA$72.40K | ▼ -1071.0% |
| 2010 | -1.59x | CA$-561.16K | CA$353.83K | ▼ -147.9% |
| 2009 | -0.64x | CA$-216.98K | CA$339.12K | ▼ -25.7% |
| 2008 | -0.51x | CA$-596.47K | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2007 | -0.32x | CA$-233.53K | CA$734.21K | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2006 | -0.80x | CA$-442.92K | CA$551.57K | ▼ -219.1% |
| 2005 | -0.25x | CA$-171.68K | CA$682.23K | ▲ +89.2% |
| 2004 | -2.34x | CA$-645.55K | CA$276.23K | ▼ -13082.0% |
| 2003 | -0.02x | CA$-51.88K | CA$2.93 Million | ▲ +99.8% |
| 2002 | -10.93x | CA$-222.22K | CA$20.32K | ▼ -1357.1% |
| 2001 | 0.87x | CA$14.55K | CA$16.73K | — |