Pure Energy Minerals Ltd (PE) — Net Asset Quality Index
Pure Energy Minerals Ltd (PE) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 99.6% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$35.94 Million minus total liabilities of CA$158.17K yields net assets of CA$35.78 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Pure Energy Minerals Ltd earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Pure Energy Minerals Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2001–2024)
This chart shows how Pure Energy Minerals Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2001 to 2024. As of December 2025, the index stands at 99.6%, representing net assets of CA$35.78 Million against total assets of CA$35.94 Million CAD. See Pure Energy Minerals Ltd net assets for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Pure Energy Minerals Ltd (2001–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Pure Energy Minerals Ltd from 2001 to 2024, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see PE stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 98.9% | CA$35.81 Million | CA$36.19 Million | CA$387.84K | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2023 | 99.5% | CA$35.41 Million | CA$35.59 Million | CA$182.30K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2022 | 99.6% | CA$35.22 Million | CA$35.38 Million | CA$157.85K | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2021 | 99.2% | CA$34.91 Million | CA$35.21 Million | CA$296.72K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 99.2% | CA$34.38 Million | CA$34.66 Million | CA$276.88K | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2019 | 98.7% | CA$34.71 Million | CA$35.17 Million | CA$459.30K | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2018 | 98.4% | CA$32.33 Million | CA$32.87 Million | CA$536.32K | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2017 | 98.7% | CA$27.86 Million | CA$28.21 Million | CA$354.58K | ▲ +3.8 pp |
| 2016 | 94.9% | CA$7.47 Million | CA$7.87 Million | CA$401.46K | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2015 | 96.9% | CA$3.75 Million | CA$3.88 Million | CA$121.67K | ▲ +8.8 pp |
| 2014 | 88.0% | CA$1.57 Million | CA$1.78 Million | CA$213.68K | ▼ -7.0 pp |
| 2013 | 95.0% | CA$1.56 Million | CA$1.64 Million | CA$82.03K | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2012 | 96.0% | CA$1.02 Million | CA$1.06 Million | CA$41.87K | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2011 | 94.2% | CA$1.18 Million | CA$1.26 Million | CA$72.40K | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2010 | 92.8% | CA$4.57 Million | CA$4.93 Million | CA$353.83K | ▲ +253.9 pp |
| 2009 | -161.1% | CA$-209.23K | CA$129.89K | CA$339.12K | ▲ +1365.4 pp |
| 2008 | -1526.5% | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$72.05K | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -395.8 pp |
| 2007 | -1130.7% | CA$-674.55K | CA$59.66K | CA$734.21K | ▼ -1021.3 pp |
| 2006 | -109.4% | CA$-288.11K | CA$263.45K | CA$551.57K | ▲ +83.1 pp |
| 2005 | -192.4% | CA$-448.94K | CA$233.28K | CA$682.23K | ▼ -184.4 pp |
| 2004 | -8.1% | CA$-20.63K | CA$255.60K | CA$276.23K | ▲ +1682.6 pp |
| 2003 | -1690.7% | CA$-2.76 Million | CA$163.41K | CA$2.93 Million | ▼ -1780.2 pp |
| 2002 | 89.5% | CA$172.70K | CA$193.02K | CA$20.32K | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2001 | 92.6% | CA$209.70K | CA$226.44K | CA$16.73K | — |