Prospera Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Prospera Energy Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Prospera Energy Inc (PEI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$69.63 Million) in one year. Check Prospera Energy Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Prospera Energy Inc (2002–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Prospera Energy Inc from 2002 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Prospera Energy Inc across 23 annual periods. Check PEI operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Prospera Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2002–2024)
Prospera Energy Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2002 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Prospera Energy Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see PEI cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.06x | CA$-3.16 Million | CA$55.91 Million | ▼ -268.7% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | CA$1.61 Million | CA$47.97 Million | ▼ -73.7% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | CA$5.34 Million | CA$42.01 Million | ▲ +190.4% |
| 2021 | -0.14x | CA$-5.47 Million | CA$38.92 Million | ▼ -636.5% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | CA$632.00K | CA$24.12 Million | ▼ -54.3% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | CA$1.30 Million | CA$22.64 Million | ▼ -26.2% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | CA$1.45 Million | CA$18.73 Million | ▲ +367.7% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | CA$-257.49K | CA$8.89 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2016 | -0.05x | CA$-421.93K | CA$7.76 Million | ▼ -164.4% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | CA$627.61K | CA$7.44 Million | ▼ -55.6% |
| 2014 | 0.19x | CA$1.41 Million | CA$7.39 Million | ▼ -41.1% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | CA$606.29K | CA$1.88 Million | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2012 | 1.04x | CA$848.12K | CA$813.71K | ▲ +378.8% |
| 2011 | -0.37x | CA$-162.64K | CA$435.11K | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2010 | -0.37x | CA$-163.96K | CA$444.80K | ▲ +21.5% |
| 2009 | -0.47x | CA$-135.92K | CA$289.58K | ▲ +93.3% |
| 2008 | -6.98x | CA$-557.24K | CA$79.87K | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2007 | -5.01x | CA$-1.13 Million | CA$226.43K | ▼ -155.3% |
| 2006 | -1.96x | CA$-664.96K | CA$339.17K | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2005 | -2.46x | CA$-379.94K | CA$154.48K | ▼ -3947.7% |
| 2004 | -0.06x | CA$-24.07K | CA$396.08K | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2003 | -0.12x | CA$-37.81K | CA$310.12K | ▲ +75.1% |
| 2002 | -0.49x | CA$-127.03K | CA$259.93K | — |