Plato Gold Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Plato Gold Corp. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Plato Gold Corp. (PGC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.09x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-309.79K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$3.41 Million) in one year. Check PGC cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Plato Gold Corp. (2003–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Plato Gold Corp. from 2003 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Plato Gold Corp. across 23 annual periods. Check PGC cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Plato Gold Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2003–2025)
Plato Gold Corp. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2003 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Plato Gold Corp.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Plato Gold Corp..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.16x | CA$-525.77K | CA$3.22 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2024 | -0.11x | CA$-161.82K | CA$1.41 Million | ▼ -149.1% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | CA$-54.87K | CA$1.19 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2022 | -0.23x | CA$-190.98K | CA$845.34K | ▼ -44.6% |
| 2021 | -0.16x | CA$-119.34K | CA$764.04K | ▲ +49.3% |
| 2020 | -0.31x | CA$-200.05K | CA$648.95K | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2019 | -0.46x | CA$-289.49K | CA$629.10K | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2018 | -0.51x | CA$-358.10K | CA$707.70K | ▼ -420.7% |
| 2017 | -0.10x | CA$-135.58K | CA$1.40 Million | ▼ -128.5% |
| 2016 | -0.04x | CA$-76.35K | CA$1.79 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 2015 | -0.08x | CA$-113.14K | CA$1.44 Million | ▲ +67.7% |
| 2014 | -0.24x | CA$-265.04K | CA$1.09 Million | ▲ +71.0% |
| 2013 | -0.84x | CA$-621.04K | CA$740.74K | ▼ -241.0% |
| 2012 | -0.25x | CA$-225.65K | CA$917.85K | ▲ +68.2% |
| 2011 | -0.77x | CA$-567.04K | CA$732.38K | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2010 | -1.08x | CA$-480.39K | CA$444.20K | ▼ -697.2% |
| 2009 | -0.14x | CA$-104.74K | CA$772.11K | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2008 | -1.00x | CA$-525.65K | CA$527.35K | ▲ +72.2% |
| 2007 | -3.59x | CA$-471.50K | CA$131.43K | ▼ -274.4% |
| 2006 | -0.96x | CA$-420.42K | CA$438.73K | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2005 | -0.84x | CA$-352.55K | CA$418.92K | ▼ -258.2% |
| 2004 | -0.23x | CA$-69.42K | CA$295.50K | ▲ +97.1% |
| 2003 | -8.15x | CA$-287.15K | CA$35.23K | — |