Panoro Minerals Ltd. (PML) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Panoro Minerals Ltd. (PML) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$21.40 Million) in one year. See Panoro Minerals Ltd. financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Panoro Minerals Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Panoro Minerals Ltd. across 24 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Panoro Minerals Ltd. cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Panoro Minerals Ltd. (2002–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Panoro Minerals Ltd.. Check Panoro Minerals Ltd. cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.10x | CA$-1.74 Million | CA$17.82 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2024 | -0.09x | CA$-1.46 Million | CA$15.48 Million | ▲ +36.5% |
| 2023 | -0.15x | CA$-3.00 Million | CA$20.19 Million | ▼ -18.5% |
| 2022 | -0.13x | CA$-2.50 Million | CA$20.01 Million | ▼ -61.0% |
| 2021 | -0.08x | CA$-1.28 Million | CA$16.51 Million | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2020 | -0.07x | CA$-1.11 Million | CA$15.04 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 2019 | -0.17x | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$12.63 Million | ▲ +40.5% |
| 2018 | -0.28x | CA$-3.10 Million | CA$10.95 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2017 | -0.28x | CA$-2.58 Million | CA$9.15 Million | ▼ -9.2% |
| 2016 | -0.26x | CA$-1.90 Million | CA$7.35 Million | ▲ +82.6% |
| 2015 | -1.49x | CA$-2.06 Million | CA$1.38 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2014 | -1.24x | CA$-2.57 Million | CA$2.08 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2013 | -1.52x | CA$-2.33 Million | CA$1.54 Million | ▼ -64.2% |
| 2012 | -0.92x | CA$-2.86 Million | CA$3.09 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2011 | -1.12x | CA$-1.57 Million | CA$1.40 Million | ▼ -367.4% |
| 2010 | -0.24x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$5.70 Million | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2009 | -0.25x | CA$-1.28 Million | CA$5.09 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2008 | -0.18x | CA$-1.02 Million | CA$5.78 Million | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2007 | -4.29x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$326.78K | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2006 | -3.81x | CA$-458.56K | CA$120.42K | ▼ -221.0% |
| 2005 | -1.19x | CA$-223.42K | CA$188.37K | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2004 | -1.90x | CA$-128.13K | CA$67.31K | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2003 | -6.30x | CA$-144.31K | CA$22.91K | ▼ -1653.0% |
| 2002 | -0.36x | CA$-3.05K | CA$8.48K | — |