Puma Exploration Inc (PUMA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Puma Exploration Inc (PUMA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-130.99K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.38 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Puma Exploration Inc generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Puma Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Puma Exploration Inc across 25 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Puma Exploration Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Puma Exploration Inc (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Puma Exploration Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see PUMA company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.34x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$519.43K | ▲ +45.2% |
| 2024 | -4.27x | CA$-1.60 Million | CA$375.12K | ▲ +29.3% |
| 2023 | -6.05x | CA$-1.79 Million | CA$296.65K | ▼ -714.7% |
| 2022 | -0.74x | CA$-1.38 Million | CA$1.86 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2021 | -1.42x | CA$-892.15K | CA$627.64K | ▼ -91.0% |
| 2020 | -0.74x | CA$-730.90K | CA$982.08K | ▼ -362.9% |
| 2019 | -0.16x | CA$-614.79K | CA$3.82 Million | ▲ +26.9% |
| 2018 | -0.22x | CA$-1.06 Million | CA$4.81 Million | ▼ -10.5% |
| 2017 | -0.20x | CA$-529.77K | CA$2.66 Million | ▼ -85.8% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | CA$-328.74K | CA$3.07 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2015 | -0.20x | CA$-583.67K | CA$2.91 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2014 | -0.16x | CA$-471.18K | CA$2.97 Million | ▲ +43.2% |
| 2013 | -0.28x | CA$-699.17K | CA$2.51 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2012 | -0.19x | CA$-434.14K | CA$2.34 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2011 | -0.22x | CA$-353.36K | CA$1.57 Million | ▼ -112.1% |
| 2010 | -0.11x | CA$-167.22K | CA$1.58 Million | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2009 | -0.10x | CA$-177.92K | CA$1.86 Million | ▼ -157.3% |
| 2008 | -0.04x | CA$-70.67K | CA$1.91 Million | ▲ +86.6% |
| 2007 | -0.28x | CA$-202.52K | CA$732.86K | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2006 | -0.70x | CA$-151.50K | CA$215.60K | ▼ -106.1% |
| 2005 | -0.34x | CA$-107.44K | CA$315.16K | ▲ +88.6% |
| 2004 | -3.00x | CA$-76.04K | CA$25.37K | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2003 | -4.21x | CA$-108.75K | CA$25.82K | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2002 | -10.41x | CA$-91.61K | CA$8.80K | ▼ -2103.9% |
| 2001 | 0.52x | CA$7.03K | CA$13.53K | — |