Puma Exploration Inc (PUMA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Puma Exploration Inc (PUMA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-130.99K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.38 Million) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Puma Exploration Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Puma Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Puma Exploration Inc across 25 annual periods. Also explore Puma Exploration Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Puma Exploration Inc (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Puma Exploration Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Puma Exploration Inc (PUMA) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.34x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$519.43K | ▲ +45.2% |
| 2024 | -4.27x | CA$-1.60 Million | CA$375.12K | ▲ +29.3% |
| 2023 | -6.05x | CA$-1.79 Million | CA$296.65K | ▼ -714.7% |
| 2022 | -0.74x | CA$-1.38 Million | CA$1.86 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2021 | -1.42x | CA$-892.15K | CA$627.64K | ▼ -91.0% |
| 2020 | -0.74x | CA$-730.90K | CA$982.08K | ▼ -362.9% |
| 2019 | -0.16x | CA$-614.79K | CA$3.82 Million | ▲ +26.9% |
| 2018 | -0.22x | CA$-1.06 Million | CA$4.81 Million | ▼ -10.5% |
| 2017 | -0.20x | CA$-529.77K | CA$2.66 Million | ▼ -85.8% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | CA$-328.74K | CA$3.07 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2015 | -0.20x | CA$-583.67K | CA$2.91 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2014 | -0.16x | CA$-471.18K | CA$2.97 Million | ▲ +43.2% |
| 2013 | -0.28x | CA$-699.17K | CA$2.51 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2012 | -0.19x | CA$-434.14K | CA$2.34 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2011 | -0.22x | CA$-353.36K | CA$1.57 Million | ▼ -112.1% |
| 2010 | -0.11x | CA$-167.22K | CA$1.58 Million | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2009 | -0.10x | CA$-177.92K | CA$1.86 Million | ▼ -157.3% |
| 2008 | -0.04x | CA$-70.67K | CA$1.91 Million | ▲ +86.6% |
| 2007 | -0.28x | CA$-202.52K | CA$732.86K | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2006 | -0.70x | CA$-151.50K | CA$215.60K | ▼ -106.1% |
| 2005 | -0.34x | CA$-107.44K | CA$315.16K | ▲ +88.6% |
| 2004 | -3.00x | CA$-76.04K | CA$25.37K | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2003 | -4.21x | CA$-108.75K | CA$25.82K | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2002 | -10.41x | CA$-91.61K | CA$8.80K | ▼ -2103.9% |
| 2001 | 0.52x | CA$7.03K | CA$13.53K | — |