Puma Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Puma Exploration Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Puma Exploration Inc (PUMA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-130.99K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.38 Million) in one year. Check PUMA capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Puma Exploration Inc (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Puma Exploration Inc from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Puma Exploration Inc across 25 annual periods. Check PUMA operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Puma Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Puma Exploration Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Puma Exploration Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Puma Exploration Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.34x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$519.43K | ▲ +45.2% |
| 2024 | -4.27x | CA$-1.60 Million | CA$375.12K | ▲ +29.3% |
| 2023 | -6.05x | CA$-1.79 Million | CA$296.65K | ▼ -714.7% |
| 2022 | -0.74x | CA$-1.38 Million | CA$1.86 Million | ▲ +47.8% |
| 2021 | -1.42x | CA$-892.15K | CA$627.64K | ▼ -91.0% |
| 2020 | -0.74x | CA$-730.90K | CA$982.08K | ▼ -362.9% |
| 2019 | -0.16x | CA$-614.79K | CA$3.82 Million | ▲ +26.9% |
| 2018 | -0.22x | CA$-1.06 Million | CA$4.81 Million | ▼ -10.5% |
| 2017 | -0.20x | CA$-529.77K | CA$2.66 Million | ▼ -85.8% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | CA$-328.74K | CA$3.07 Million | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2015 | -0.20x | CA$-583.67K | CA$2.91 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2014 | -0.16x | CA$-471.18K | CA$2.97 Million | ▲ +43.2% |
| 2013 | -0.28x | CA$-699.17K | CA$2.51 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2012 | -0.19x | CA$-434.14K | CA$2.34 Million | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2011 | -0.22x | CA$-353.36K | CA$1.57 Million | ▼ -112.1% |
| 2010 | -0.11x | CA$-167.22K | CA$1.58 Million | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2009 | -0.10x | CA$-177.92K | CA$1.86 Million | ▼ -157.3% |
| 2008 | -0.04x | CA$-70.67K | CA$1.91 Million | ▲ +86.6% |
| 2007 | -0.28x | CA$-202.52K | CA$732.86K | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2006 | -0.70x | CA$-151.50K | CA$215.60K | ▼ -106.1% |
| 2005 | -0.34x | CA$-107.44K | CA$315.16K | ▲ +88.6% |
| 2004 | -3.00x | CA$-76.04K | CA$25.37K | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2003 | -4.21x | CA$-108.75K | CA$25.82K | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2002 | -10.41x | CA$-91.61K | CA$8.80K | ▼ -2103.9% |
| 2001 | 0.52x | CA$7.03K | CA$13.53K | — |