Res Robex Inc (RBX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Res Robex Inc (RBX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$31.46 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$351.24 Million) in one year. See RBX free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Res Robex Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Res Robex Inc across 24 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Res Robex Inc cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Res Robex Inc (2001–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Res Robex Inc. Check Res Robex Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.32x | CA$46.89 Million | CA$147.42 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 2023 | 0.64x | CA$53.27 Million | CA$82.92 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2022 | 0.54x | CA$29.82 Million | CA$55.21 Million | ▼ -45.9% |
| 2021 | 1.00x | CA$43.92 Million | CA$44.02 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 2020 | 2.49x | CA$63.47 Million | CA$25.53 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2019 | 1.83x | CA$45.84 Million | CA$25.03 Million | ▲ +288.0% |
| 2018 | 0.47x | CA$24.91 Million | CA$52.78 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2017 | 0.43x | CA$24.21 Million | CA$56.14 Million | ▲ +657.0% |
| 2016 | -0.08x | CA$-4.64 Million | CA$59.90 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | CA$-2.34 Million | CA$47.48 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 2014 | -0.11x | CA$-5.42 Million | CA$47.35 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2013 | -0.12x | CA$-3.16 Million | CA$26.48 Million | ▲ +67.2% |
| 2012 | -0.36x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$3.43 Million | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2011 | -1.44x | CA$-1.28 Million | CA$892.77K | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2010 | -0.99x | CA$-258.33K | CA$261.62K | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2009 | -2.94x | CA$-651.56K | CA$221.26K | ▼ -2646.3% |
| 2008 | -0.11x | CA$-62.13K | CA$579.43K | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2007 | -0.91x | CA$-537.57K | CA$591.95K | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2006 | -1.05x | CA$-594.30K | CA$567.42K | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2005 | -0.60x | CA$-424.61K | CA$709.20K | ▲ +61.6% |
| 2004 | -1.56x | CA$-778.85K | CA$499.49K | ▼ -183.4% |
| 2003 | -0.55x | CA$-296.49K | CA$538.93K | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2002 | -0.67x | CA$-325.29K | CA$488.76K | ▼ -130.7% |
| 2001 | -0.29x | CA$-143.54K | CA$497.50K | — |