Res Robex Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Res Robex Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Res Robex Inc (RBX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$31.46 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$351.24 Million) in one year. Check RBX cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Res Robex Inc (2001–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Res Robex Inc from 2001 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Res Robex Inc across 24 annual periods. Check Res Robex Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Res Robex Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2024)
Res Robex Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Res Robex Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see RBX cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.32x | CA$46.89 Million | CA$147.42 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 2023 | 0.64x | CA$53.27 Million | CA$82.92 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2022 | 0.54x | CA$29.82 Million | CA$55.21 Million | ▼ -45.9% |
| 2021 | 1.00x | CA$43.92 Million | CA$44.02 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 2020 | 2.49x | CA$63.47 Million | CA$25.53 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2019 | 1.83x | CA$45.84 Million | CA$25.03 Million | ▲ +288.0% |
| 2018 | 0.47x | CA$24.91 Million | CA$52.78 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2017 | 0.43x | CA$24.21 Million | CA$56.14 Million | ▲ +657.0% |
| 2016 | -0.08x | CA$-4.64 Million | CA$59.90 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | CA$-2.34 Million | CA$47.48 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 2014 | -0.11x | CA$-5.42 Million | CA$47.35 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2013 | -0.12x | CA$-3.16 Million | CA$26.48 Million | ▲ +67.2% |
| 2012 | -0.36x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$3.43 Million | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2011 | -1.44x | CA$-1.28 Million | CA$892.77K | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2010 | -0.99x | CA$-258.33K | CA$261.62K | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2009 | -2.94x | CA$-651.56K | CA$221.26K | ▼ -2646.3% |
| 2008 | -0.11x | CA$-62.13K | CA$579.43K | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2007 | -0.91x | CA$-537.57K | CA$591.95K | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2006 | -1.05x | CA$-594.30K | CA$567.42K | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2005 | -0.60x | CA$-424.61K | CA$709.20K | ▲ +61.6% |
| 2004 | -1.56x | CA$-778.85K | CA$499.49K | ▼ -183.4% |
| 2003 | -0.55x | CA$-296.49K | CA$538.93K | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2002 | -0.67x | CA$-325.29K | CA$488.76K | ▼ -130.7% |
| 2001 | -0.29x | CA$-143.54K | CA$497.50K | — |