Res Robex Inc (RBX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Res Robex Inc (RBX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$31.46 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$351.24 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Res Robex Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Res Robex Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Res Robex Inc across 24 annual periods. Also explore Res Robex Inc equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Res Robex Inc (2001–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Res Robex Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Res Robex Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.32x | CA$46.89 Million | CA$147.42 Million | ▼ -50.5% |
| 2023 | 0.64x | CA$53.27 Million | CA$82.92 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2022 | 0.54x | CA$29.82 Million | CA$55.21 Million | ▼ -45.9% |
| 2021 | 1.00x | CA$43.92 Million | CA$44.02 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 2020 | 2.49x | CA$63.47 Million | CA$25.53 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2019 | 1.83x | CA$45.84 Million | CA$25.03 Million | ▲ +288.0% |
| 2018 | 0.47x | CA$24.91 Million | CA$52.78 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2017 | 0.43x | CA$24.21 Million | CA$56.14 Million | ▲ +657.0% |
| 2016 | -0.08x | CA$-4.64 Million | CA$59.90 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | CA$-2.34 Million | CA$47.48 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 2014 | -0.11x | CA$-5.42 Million | CA$47.35 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2013 | -0.12x | CA$-3.16 Million | CA$26.48 Million | ▲ +67.2% |
| 2012 | -0.36x | CA$-1.25 Million | CA$3.43 Million | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2011 | -1.44x | CA$-1.28 Million | CA$892.77K | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2010 | -0.99x | CA$-258.33K | CA$261.62K | ▲ +66.5% |
| 2009 | -2.94x | CA$-651.56K | CA$221.26K | ▼ -2646.3% |
| 2008 | -0.11x | CA$-62.13K | CA$579.43K | ▲ +88.2% |
| 2007 | -0.91x | CA$-537.57K | CA$591.95K | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2006 | -1.05x | CA$-594.30K | CA$567.42K | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2005 | -0.60x | CA$-424.61K | CA$709.20K | ▲ +61.6% |
| 2004 | -1.56x | CA$-778.85K | CA$499.49K | ▼ -183.4% |
| 2003 | -0.55x | CA$-296.49K | CA$538.93K | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2002 | -0.67x | CA$-325.29K | CA$488.76K | ▼ -130.7% |
| 2001 | -0.29x | CA$-143.54K | CA$497.50K | — |