Orex Minerals Inc (REX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Orex Minerals Inc (REX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.34x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-492.39K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.45 Million) in one year. See Orex Minerals Inc (REX) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Orex Minerals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Orex Minerals Inc across 26 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see REX cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Orex Minerals Inc (2001–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Orex Minerals Inc. Check REX cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.83x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$1.45 Million | ▲ +79.3% |
| 2025 | -4.02x | CA$-2.11 Million | CA$524.38K | ▼ -86.5% |
| 2024 | -2.16x | CA$-1.13 Million | CA$523.48K | ▲ +89.8% |
| 2023 | -21.06x | CA$-1.76 Million | CA$83.42K | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2022 | -24.45x | CA$-1.77 Million | CA$72.37K | ▲ +21.4% |
| 2021 | -31.12x | CA$-2.06 Million | CA$66.18K | ▼ -118.9% |
| 2020 | -14.22x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$103.97K | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2019 | -21.32x | CA$-1.90 Million | CA$89.22K | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2018 | -28.23x | CA$-1.83 Million | CA$64.71K | ▲ +72.1% |
| 2017 | -101.00x | CA$-5.00 Million | CA$49.55K | ▼ -1246.8% |
| 2016 | -7.50x | CA$-4.08 Million | CA$543.71K | ▼ -103.4% |
| 2015 | -3.69x | CA$-6.05 Million | CA$1.64 Million | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2014 | -5.27x | CA$-4.04 Million | CA$767.40K | ▼ -708.8% |
| 2013 | -0.65x | CA$-2.93 Million | CA$4.50 Million | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2012 | -1.11x | CA$-4.46 Million | CA$4.01 Million | ▼ -83.0% |
| 2011 | -0.61x | CA$-2.91 Million | CA$4.80 Million | ▲ +97.6% |
| 2010 | -24.95x | CA$-2.59 Million | CA$103.63K | ▼ -204.1% |
| 2009 | -8.20x | CA$-2.51 Million | CA$305.90K | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2008 | -17.34x | CA$-1.77 Million | CA$102.25K | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2007 | -14.28x | CA$-1.57 Million | CA$109.80K | ▲ +69.2% |
| 2006 | -46.34x | CA$-792.54K | CA$17.10K | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2005 | -28.55x | CA$-925.77K | CA$32.42K | ▲ +45.2% |
| 2004 | -52.06x | CA$-343.88K | CA$6.61K | ▼ -571.1% |
| 2003 | -7.76x | CA$-217.56K | CA$28.05K | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2002 | -11.89x | CA$-270.20K | CA$22.73K | ▼ -314.4% |
| 2001 | -2.87x | CA$-120.75K | CA$42.09K | — |