Surge Copper Corp (SURG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Surge Copper Corp (SURG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.16x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$935.14K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$6.01 Million) in one year. Check Surge Copper Corp cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Surge Copper Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Surge Copper Corp across 25 annual periods. Also explore Surge Copper Corp balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Surge Copper Corp (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Surge Copper Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SURG stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.42x | CA$-1.93 Million | CA$4.57 Million | ▼ -143.9% |
| 2024 | -0.17x | CA$-849.75K | CA$4.91 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2023 | -0.15x | CA$-871.36K | CA$5.65 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2022 | -0.27x | CA$-1.56 Million | CA$5.75 Million | ▲ +64.1% |
| 2021 | -0.76x | CA$-1.47 Million | CA$1.95 Million | ▼ -476.9% |
| 2020 | -0.13x | CA$-43.38K | CA$330.39K | ▲ +89.8% |
| 2019 | -1.29x | CA$-440.25K | CA$342.38K | ▼ -31.4% |
| 2018 | -0.98x | CA$-413.18K | CA$422.27K | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2017 | -0.85x | CA$-595.87K | CA$698.97K | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2016 | -1.16x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$887.54K | ▼ -244.2% |
| 2015 | 0.80x | CA$928.79K | CA$1.16 Million | ▲ +177.9% |
| 2014 | -1.03x | CA$-1.15 Million | CA$1.11 Million | ▼ -53.5% |
| 2013 | -0.67x | CA$-900.65K | CA$1.34 Million | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2012 | -0.96x | CA$-725.17K | CA$753.37K | ▲ +61.9% |
| 2011 | -2.53x | CA$-659.44K | CA$261.07K | ▼ -175.8% |
| 2010 | -0.92x | CA$-468.44K | CA$511.57K | ▼ -145.0% |
| 2009 | -0.37x | CA$-228.79K | CA$612.15K | ▲ +60.5% |
| 2008 | -0.95x | CA$-510.45K | CA$540.12K | ▲ +60.5% |
| 2007 | -2.39x | CA$-440.58K | CA$184.34K | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2006 | -1.32x | CA$-260.93K | CA$197.09K | ▼ -263.0% |
| 2005 | -0.36x | CA$-77.82K | CA$213.39K | ▼ -116.2% |
| 2004 | -0.17x | CA$-29.22K | CA$173.19K | ▲ +95.8% |
| 2003 | -4.06x | CA$-419.84K | CA$103.37K | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2002 | -4.62x | CA$-399.23K | CA$86.37K | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2001 | -6.83x | CA$-342.45K | CA$50.12K | — |