Surge Copper Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Surge Copper Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Surge Copper Corp (SURG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.16x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$935.14K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$6.01 Million) in one year. Check SURG operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Surge Copper Corp (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Surge Copper Corp from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Surge Copper Corp across 25 annual periods. Check SURG total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Surge Copper Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Surge Copper Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Surge Copper Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Surge Copper Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.42x | CA$-1.93 Million | CA$4.57 Million | ▼ -143.9% |
| 2024 | -0.17x | CA$-849.75K | CA$4.91 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2023 | -0.15x | CA$-871.36K | CA$5.65 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2022 | -0.27x | CA$-1.56 Million | CA$5.75 Million | ▲ +64.1% |
| 2021 | -0.76x | CA$-1.47 Million | CA$1.95 Million | ▼ -476.9% |
| 2020 | -0.13x | CA$-43.38K | CA$330.39K | ▲ +89.8% |
| 2019 | -1.29x | CA$-440.25K | CA$342.38K | ▼ -31.4% |
| 2018 | -0.98x | CA$-413.18K | CA$422.27K | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2017 | -0.85x | CA$-595.87K | CA$698.97K | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2016 | -1.16x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$887.54K | ▼ -244.2% |
| 2015 | 0.80x | CA$928.79K | CA$1.16 Million | ▲ +177.9% |
| 2014 | -1.03x | CA$-1.15 Million | CA$1.11 Million | ▼ -53.5% |
| 2013 | -0.67x | CA$-900.65K | CA$1.34 Million | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2012 | -0.96x | CA$-725.17K | CA$753.37K | ▲ +61.9% |
| 2011 | -2.53x | CA$-659.44K | CA$261.07K | ▼ -175.8% |
| 2010 | -0.92x | CA$-468.44K | CA$511.57K | ▼ -145.0% |
| 2009 | -0.37x | CA$-228.79K | CA$612.15K | ▲ +60.5% |
| 2008 | -0.95x | CA$-510.45K | CA$540.12K | ▲ +60.5% |
| 2007 | -2.39x | CA$-440.58K | CA$184.34K | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2006 | -1.32x | CA$-260.93K | CA$197.09K | ▼ -263.0% |
| 2005 | -0.36x | CA$-77.82K | CA$213.39K | ▼ -116.2% |
| 2004 | -0.17x | CA$-29.22K | CA$173.19K | ▲ +95.8% |
| 2003 | -4.06x | CA$-419.84K | CA$103.37K | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2002 | -4.62x | CA$-399.23K | CA$86.37K | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2001 | -6.83x | CA$-342.45K | CA$50.12K | — |