Surge Copper Corp (SURG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Surge Copper Corp (SURG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.16x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$935.14K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$6.01 Million) in one year. See Surge Copper Corp (SURG) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Surge Copper Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Surge Copper Corp across 25 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Surge Copper Corp to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Surge Copper Corp (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Surge Copper Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SURG company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.42x | CA$-1.93 Million | CA$4.57 Million | ▼ -143.9% |
| 2024 | -0.17x | CA$-849.75K | CA$4.91 Million | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2023 | -0.15x | CA$-871.36K | CA$5.65 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2022 | -0.27x | CA$-1.56 Million | CA$5.75 Million | ▲ +64.1% |
| 2021 | -0.76x | CA$-1.47 Million | CA$1.95 Million | ▼ -476.9% |
| 2020 | -0.13x | CA$-43.38K | CA$330.39K | ▲ +89.8% |
| 2019 | -1.29x | CA$-440.25K | CA$342.38K | ▼ -31.4% |
| 2018 | -0.98x | CA$-413.18K | CA$422.27K | ▼ -14.8% |
| 2017 | -0.85x | CA$-595.87K | CA$698.97K | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2016 | -1.16x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$887.54K | ▼ -244.2% |
| 2015 | 0.80x | CA$928.79K | CA$1.16 Million | ▲ +177.9% |
| 2014 | -1.03x | CA$-1.15 Million | CA$1.11 Million | ▼ -53.5% |
| 2013 | -0.67x | CA$-900.65K | CA$1.34 Million | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2012 | -0.96x | CA$-725.17K | CA$753.37K | ▲ +61.9% |
| 2011 | -2.53x | CA$-659.44K | CA$261.07K | ▼ -175.8% |
| 2010 | -0.92x | CA$-468.44K | CA$511.57K | ▼ -145.0% |
| 2009 | -0.37x | CA$-228.79K | CA$612.15K | ▲ +60.5% |
| 2008 | -0.95x | CA$-510.45K | CA$540.12K | ▲ +60.5% |
| 2007 | -2.39x | CA$-440.58K | CA$184.34K | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2006 | -1.32x | CA$-260.93K | CA$197.09K | ▼ -263.0% |
| 2005 | -0.36x | CA$-77.82K | CA$213.39K | ▼ -116.2% |
| 2004 | -0.17x | CA$-29.22K | CA$173.19K | ▲ +95.8% |
| 2003 | -4.06x | CA$-419.84K | CA$103.37K | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2002 | -4.62x | CA$-399.23K | CA$86.37K | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2001 | -6.83x | CA$-342.45K | CA$50.12K | — |