Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc (TBRD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-7.42 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$114.12 Million) in one year. Check TBRD cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc (2001–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc from 2001 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc across 24 annual periods. Check TBRD cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2024)
Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.36x | CA$37.67 Million | CA$103.30 Million | ▲ +312.7% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | CA$13.18 Million | CA$149.18 Million | ▲ +344.5% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | CA$-5.56 Million | CA$153.90 Million | ▼ -115.3% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | CA$22.79 Million | CA$96.21 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | CA$15.54 Million | CA$101.52 Million | ▲ +248.6% |
| 2019 | -0.10x | CA$-8.57 Million | CA$83.18 Million | ▲ +98.4% |
| 2018 | -6.51x | CA$-111.53K | CA$17.14K | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2017 | -7.12x | CA$-172.65K | CA$24.25K | ▼ -939.7% |
| 2016 | -0.68x | CA$-147.55K | CA$215.47K | ▲ +76.9% |
| 2015 | -2.96x | CA$-170.13K | CA$57.48K | ▼ -211.4% |
| 2014 | -0.95x | CA$-181.70K | CA$191.19K | ▼ -136.1% |
| 2013 | -0.40x | CA$-175.65K | CA$436.33K | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2012 | -0.46x | CA$-101.20K | CA$217.95K | ▼ -64.5% |
| 2011 | -0.28x | CA$-32.60K | CA$115.52K | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2010 | -0.25x | CA$-11.04K | CA$44.74K | ▼ -180.2% |
| 2009 | -0.09x | CA$-35.88K | CA$407.52K | ▲ +72.6% |
| 2008 | -0.32x | CA$-91.30K | CA$284.31K | ▲ +64.8% |
| 2007 | -0.91x | CA$-151.46K | CA$166.08K | ▼ -203.1% |
| 2006 | -0.30x | CA$-50.28K | CA$167.10K | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2005 | -1.58x | CA$-121.71K | CA$77.06K | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2004 | -3.71x | CA$-84.06K | CA$22.68K | ▼ -178.5% |
| 2003 | -1.33x | CA$-71.66K | CA$53.86K | ▼ -241.2% |
| 2002 | -0.39x | CA$-21.85K | CA$56.04K | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2001 | -0.38x | CA$-37.23K | CA$96.71K | — |