Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc (TBRD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc (TBRD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-7.42 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$114.12 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc across 24 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc (2001–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Thunderbird Entertainment Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TBRD stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.36x | CA$37.67 Million | CA$103.30 Million | ▲ +312.7% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | CA$13.18 Million | CA$149.18 Million | ▲ +344.5% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | CA$-5.56 Million | CA$153.90 Million | ▼ -115.3% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | CA$22.79 Million | CA$96.21 Million | ▲ +54.7% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | CA$15.54 Million | CA$101.52 Million | ▲ +248.6% |
| 2019 | -0.10x | CA$-8.57 Million | CA$83.18 Million | ▲ +98.4% |
| 2018 | -6.51x | CA$-111.53K | CA$17.14K | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2017 | -7.12x | CA$-172.65K | CA$24.25K | ▼ -939.7% |
| 2016 | -0.68x | CA$-147.55K | CA$215.47K | ▲ +76.9% |
| 2015 | -2.96x | CA$-170.13K | CA$57.48K | ▼ -211.4% |
| 2014 | -0.95x | CA$-181.70K | CA$191.19K | ▼ -136.1% |
| 2013 | -0.40x | CA$-175.65K | CA$436.33K | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2012 | -0.46x | CA$-101.20K | CA$217.95K | ▼ -64.5% |
| 2011 | -0.28x | CA$-32.60K | CA$115.52K | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2010 | -0.25x | CA$-11.04K | CA$44.74K | ▼ -180.2% |
| 2009 | -0.09x | CA$-35.88K | CA$407.52K | ▲ +72.6% |
| 2008 | -0.32x | CA$-91.30K | CA$284.31K | ▲ +64.8% |
| 2007 | -0.91x | CA$-151.46K | CA$166.08K | ▼ -203.1% |
| 2006 | -0.30x | CA$-50.28K | CA$167.10K | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2005 | -1.58x | CA$-121.71K | CA$77.06K | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2004 | -3.71x | CA$-84.06K | CA$22.68K | ▼ -178.5% |
| 2003 | -1.33x | CA$-71.66K | CA$53.86K | ▼ -241.2% |
| 2002 | -0.39x | CA$-21.85K | CA$56.04K | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2001 | -0.38x | CA$-37.23K | CA$96.71K | — |