Theralase Technologies Inc. (TLT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Theralase Technologies Inc. (TLT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.13x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-244.54K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.94 Million) in one year. Check TLT cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Theralase Technologies Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Theralase Technologies Inc. across 25 annual periods. Also explore TLT total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Theralase Technologies Inc. (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Theralase Technologies Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TLT market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.91x | CA$-3.29 Million | CA$1.72 Million | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2024 | -2.82x | CA$-3.33 Million | CA$1.18 Million | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2023 | -2.97x | CA$-4.07 Million | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +38.2% |
| 2022 | -4.80x | CA$-5.13 Million | CA$1.07 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2021 | -4.61x | CA$-4.03 Million | CA$874.79K | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2020 | -5.19x | CA$-4.45 Million | CA$857.13K | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2019 | -4.07x | CA$-6.57 Million | CA$1.61 Million | ▼ -758.3% |
| 2018 | -0.47x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$2.57 Million | ▲ +85.8% |
| 2017 | -3.34x | CA$-4.26 Million | CA$1.28 Million | ▲ +62.4% |
| 2016 | -8.88x | CA$-4.88 Million | CA$549.74K | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2015 | -6.42x | CA$-5.04 Million | CA$785.66K | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2014 | -7.08x | CA$-3.63 Million | CA$511.75K | ▼ -611.7% |
| 2013 | -1.00x | CA$-916.67K | CA$920.99K | ▼ -96.4% |
| 2012 | -0.51x | CA$-606.72K | CA$1.20 Million | ▲ +65.4% |
| 2011 | -1.46x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$955.71K | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2010 | -1.44x | CA$-1.02 Million | CA$706.35K | ▼ -2375.6% |
| 2009 | -0.06x | CA$-40.95K | CA$703.90K | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2008 | -0.44x | CA$-351.19K | CA$794.79K | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2007 | -1.05x | CA$-351.49K | CA$335.12K | ▼ -1176.2% |
| 2006 | -0.08x | CA$-25.78K | CA$313.74K | ▼ -115.3% |
| 2005 | 0.54x | CA$85.33K | CA$158.99K | ▲ +199.4% |
| 2004 | -0.54x | CA$-87.23K | CA$161.52K | ▲ +39.4% |
| 2003 | -0.89x | CA$-192.39K | CA$215.75K | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2002 | -4.53x | CA$-48.52K | CA$10.72K | ▲ +47.6% |
| 2001 | -8.64x | CA$-82.62K | CA$9.56K | — |