Theralase Technologies Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Theralase Technologies Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Theralase Technologies Inc. (TLT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.96x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.23 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$1.28 Million) in one year. Check Theralase Technologies Inc. earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Theralase Technologies Inc. (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Theralase Technologies Inc. from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Theralase Technologies Inc. across 25 annual periods. Check TLT cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Theralase Technologies Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Theralase Technologies Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Theralase Technologies Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TLT cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.91x | CA$-3.29 Million | CA$1.72 Million | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2024 | -2.82x | CA$-3.33 Million | CA$1.18 Million | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2023 | -2.97x | CA$-4.07 Million | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +38.2% |
| 2022 | -4.80x | CA$-5.13 Million | CA$1.07 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2021 | -4.61x | CA$-4.03 Million | CA$874.79K | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2020 | -5.19x | CA$-4.45 Million | CA$857.13K | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2019 | -4.07x | CA$-6.57 Million | CA$1.61 Million | ▼ -758.3% |
| 2018 | -0.47x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$2.57 Million | ▲ +85.8% |
| 2017 | -3.34x | CA$-4.26 Million | CA$1.28 Million | ▲ +62.4% |
| 2016 | -8.88x | CA$-4.88 Million | CA$549.74K | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2015 | -6.42x | CA$-5.04 Million | CA$785.66K | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2014 | -7.08x | CA$-3.63 Million | CA$511.75K | ▼ -611.7% |
| 2013 | -1.00x | CA$-916.67K | CA$920.99K | ▼ -96.4% |
| 2012 | -0.51x | CA$-606.72K | CA$1.20 Million | ▲ +65.4% |
| 2011 | -1.46x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$955.71K | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2010 | -1.44x | CA$-1.02 Million | CA$706.35K | ▼ -2375.6% |
| 2009 | -0.06x | CA$-40.95K | CA$703.90K | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2008 | -0.44x | CA$-351.19K | CA$794.79K | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2007 | -1.05x | CA$-351.49K | CA$335.12K | ▼ -1176.2% |
| 2006 | -0.08x | CA$-25.78K | CA$313.74K | ▼ -115.3% |
| 2005 | 0.54x | CA$85.33K | CA$158.99K | ▲ +199.4% |
| 2004 | -0.54x | CA$-87.23K | CA$161.52K | ▲ +39.4% |
| 2003 | -0.89x | CA$-192.39K | CA$215.75K | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2002 | -4.53x | CA$-48.52K | CA$10.72K | ▲ +47.6% |
| 2001 | -8.64x | CA$-82.62K | CA$9.56K | — |