Theralase Technologies Inc. (TLT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Theralase Technologies Inc. (TLT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.96x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.23 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$1.28 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Theralase Technologies Inc. to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Theralase Technologies Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Theralase Technologies Inc. across 25 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TLT cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Theralase Technologies Inc. (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Theralase Technologies Inc.. Check Theralase Technologies Inc. earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.91x | CA$-3.29 Million | CA$1.72 Million | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2024 | -2.82x | CA$-3.33 Million | CA$1.18 Million | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2023 | -2.97x | CA$-4.07 Million | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +38.2% |
| 2022 | -4.80x | CA$-5.13 Million | CA$1.07 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2021 | -4.61x | CA$-4.03 Million | CA$874.79K | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2020 | -5.19x | CA$-4.45 Million | CA$857.13K | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2019 | -4.07x | CA$-6.57 Million | CA$1.61 Million | ▼ -758.3% |
| 2018 | -0.47x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$2.57 Million | ▲ +85.8% |
| 2017 | -3.34x | CA$-4.26 Million | CA$1.28 Million | ▲ +62.4% |
| 2016 | -8.88x | CA$-4.88 Million | CA$549.74K | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2015 | -6.42x | CA$-5.04 Million | CA$785.66K | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2014 | -7.08x | CA$-3.63 Million | CA$511.75K | ▼ -611.7% |
| 2013 | -1.00x | CA$-916.67K | CA$920.99K | ▼ -96.4% |
| 2012 | -0.51x | CA$-606.72K | CA$1.20 Million | ▲ +65.4% |
| 2011 | -1.46x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$955.71K | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2010 | -1.44x | CA$-1.02 Million | CA$706.35K | ▼ -2375.6% |
| 2009 | -0.06x | CA$-40.95K | CA$703.90K | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2008 | -0.44x | CA$-351.19K | CA$794.79K | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2007 | -1.05x | CA$-351.49K | CA$335.12K | ▼ -1176.2% |
| 2006 | -0.08x | CA$-25.78K | CA$313.74K | ▼ -115.3% |
| 2005 | 0.54x | CA$85.33K | CA$158.99K | ▲ +199.4% |
| 2004 | -0.54x | CA$-87.23K | CA$161.52K | ▲ +39.4% |
| 2003 | -0.89x | CA$-192.39K | CA$215.75K | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2002 | -4.53x | CA$-48.52K | CA$10.72K | ▲ +47.6% |
| 2001 | -8.64x | CA$-82.62K | CA$9.56K | — |