TNR Gold Corp. (TNR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TNR Gold Corp. (TNR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.67x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-150.97K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$224.03K) in one year. Explore TNR long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
TNR Gold Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for TNR Gold Corp. across 27 annual periods. Also explore TNR Gold Corp. assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for TNR Gold Corp. (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TNR Gold Corp.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TNR Gold Corp. stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -15.27x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$72.34K | ▼ -187.1% |
| 2024 | -5.32x | CA$-819.20K | CA$154.00K | ▲ +91.6% |
| 2023 | -63.54x | CA$-2.24 Million | CA$35.30K | ▼ -53635.0% |
| 2022 | -0.12x | CA$-872.53K | CA$7.38 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2021 | -0.10x | CA$-696.07K | CA$7.17 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2020 | -0.08x | CA$-492.30K | CA$6.20 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | CA$-495.62K | CA$5.27 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | CA$-518.77K | CA$5.87 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2017 | -0.12x | CA$-588.48K | CA$4.97 Million | ▼ -58.6% |
| 2016 | -0.07x | CA$-343.74K | CA$4.61 Million | ▲ +51.1% |
| 2015 | -0.15x | CA$-585.90K | CA$3.84 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2014 | -0.17x | CA$-746.57K | CA$4.41 Million | ▼ -207.9% |
| 2013 | -0.05x | CA$-287.27K | CA$5.23 Million | ▲ +78.2% |
| 2012 | -0.25x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$5.54 Million | ▲ +73.1% |
| 2011 | -0.94x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$1.60 Million | ▲ +65.0% |
| 2010 | -2.68x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$676.96K | ▼ -119.8% |
| 2009 | -1.22x | CA$-1.33 Million | CA$1.09 Million | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2008 | -0.78x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$1.57 Million | ▲ +50.1% |
| 2007 | -1.56x | CA$-818.75K | CA$524.56K | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2006 | -2.81x | CA$-678.75K | CA$241.57K | ▼ -86.0% |
| 2005 | -1.51x | CA$-400.12K | CA$264.89K | ▲ +25.8% |
| 2004 | -2.04x | CA$-642.33K | CA$315.44K | ▼ -80.0% |
| 2003 | -1.13x | CA$-518.35K | CA$458.12K | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2002 | -2.25x | CA$-444.35K | CA$197.46K | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2001 | -1.50x | CA$-221.32K | CA$147.81K | ▼ -145.6% |
| 2000 | -0.61x | CA$-122.87K | CA$201.55K | ▲ +66.5% |
| 1999 | -1.82x | CA$-181.43K | CA$99.75K | — |