TNR Gold Corp. (TNR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TNR Gold Corp. (TNR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -6.11x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-473.91K could theoretically repay -6% of its total liabilities (CA$77.62K) in one year. See TNR FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
TNR Gold Corp. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for TNR Gold Corp. across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does TNR Gold Corp. generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for TNR Gold Corp. (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TNR Gold Corp.. Check earnings quality score of TNR Gold Corp. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -15.27x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$72.34K | ▼ -187.1% |
| 2024 | -5.32x | CA$-819.20K | CA$154.00K | ▲ +91.6% |
| 2023 | -63.54x | CA$-2.24 Million | CA$35.30K | ▼ -53635.0% |
| 2022 | -0.12x | CA$-872.53K | CA$7.38 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2021 | -0.10x | CA$-696.07K | CA$7.17 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2020 | -0.08x | CA$-492.30K | CA$6.20 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2019 | -0.09x | CA$-495.62K | CA$5.27 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | CA$-518.77K | CA$5.87 Million | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2017 | -0.12x | CA$-588.48K | CA$4.97 Million | ▼ -58.6% |
| 2016 | -0.07x | CA$-343.74K | CA$4.61 Million | ▲ +51.1% |
| 2015 | -0.15x | CA$-585.90K | CA$3.84 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2014 | -0.17x | CA$-746.57K | CA$4.41 Million | ▼ -207.9% |
| 2013 | -0.05x | CA$-287.27K | CA$5.23 Million | ▲ +78.2% |
| 2012 | -0.25x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$5.54 Million | ▲ +73.1% |
| 2011 | -0.94x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$1.60 Million | ▲ +65.0% |
| 2010 | -2.68x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$676.96K | ▼ -119.8% |
| 2009 | -1.22x | CA$-1.33 Million | CA$1.09 Million | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2008 | -0.78x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$1.57 Million | ▲ +50.1% |
| 2007 | -1.56x | CA$-818.75K | CA$524.56K | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2006 | -2.81x | CA$-678.75K | CA$241.57K | ▼ -86.0% |
| 2005 | -1.51x | CA$-400.12K | CA$264.89K | ▲ +25.8% |
| 2004 | -2.04x | CA$-642.33K | CA$315.44K | ▼ -80.0% |
| 2003 | -1.13x | CA$-518.35K | CA$458.12K | ▲ +49.7% |
| 2002 | -2.25x | CA$-444.35K | CA$197.46K | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2001 | -1.50x | CA$-221.32K | CA$147.81K | ▼ -145.6% |
| 2000 | -0.61x | CA$-122.87K | CA$201.55K | ▲ +66.5% |
| 1999 | -1.82x | CA$-181.43K | CA$99.75K | — |