Total Telcom Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Total Telcom Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Total Telcom Inc (TTZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.30x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$174.79K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$573.41K) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Total Telcom Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Total Telcom Inc (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Total Telcom Inc from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Total Telcom Inc across 27 annual periods. Check TTZ total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Total Telcom Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Total Telcom Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Total Telcom Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Total Telcom Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.26x | CA$669.91K | CA$531.04K | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2024 | 1.19x | CA$758.82K | CA$638.06K | ▼ -35.0% |
| 2023 | 1.83x | CA$798.67K | CA$436.43K | ▲ +89.7% |
| 2022 | 0.96x | CA$475.65K | CA$492.94K | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2021 | 1.35x | CA$659.62K | CA$486.92K | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2020 | 0.90x | CA$460.33K | CA$511.46K | ▼ -55.6% |
| 2019 | 2.03x | CA$404.48K | CA$199.46K | ▼ -39.2% |
| 2018 | 3.33x | CA$645.37K | CA$193.56K | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2017 | 2.63x | CA$399.56K | CA$151.96K | ▲ +2388.5% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | CA$15.44K | CA$146.13K | ▼ -95.2% |
| 2015 | 2.18x | CA$264.48K | CA$121.23K | ▲ +190.3% |
| 2014 | -2.42x | CA$-364.19K | CA$150.70K | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2013 | -3.45x | CA$-525.95K | CA$152.37K | ▼ -54.8% |
| 2012 | -2.23x | CA$-549.60K | CA$246.47K | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2011 | -1.65x | CA$-271.28K | CA$163.98K | ▲ +54.8% |
| 2010 | -3.66x | CA$-377.66K | CA$103.28K | ▼ -157.2% |
| 2009 | -1.42x | CA$-163.81K | CA$115.24K | ▼ -951.0% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | CA$126.44K | CA$756.88K | ▼ -50.1% |
| 2007 | 0.33x | CA$105.71K | CA$316.06K | ▲ +329.9% |
| 2006 | -0.15x | CA$-22.01K | CA$151.26K | ▼ -20822.3% |
| 2005 | 0.00x | CA$1.78K | CA$2.54 Million | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2004 | 0.69x | CA$2.85 Million | CA$4.13 Million | ▲ +232.5% |
| 2003 | -0.52x | CA$-2.09 Million | CA$4.01 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2002 | -0.54x | CA$-6.17 Million | CA$11.44 Million | ▼ -523.1% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | CA$1.64 Million | CA$12.88 Million | ▼ -62.4% |
| 2000 | 0.34x | CA$1.61 Million | CA$4.76 Million | ▲ +186.0% |
| 1999 | -0.39x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$3.30 Million | — |