Honey Badger Silver Inc (TUF) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Honey Badger Silver Inc (TUF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.27x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.00 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$791.94K) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Honey Badger Silver Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Honey Badger Silver Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Honey Badger Silver Inc across 23 annual periods. Also explore Honey Badger Silver Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Honey Badger Silver Inc (2001–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Honey Badger Silver Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TUF company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -4.56x | CA$-1.77 Million | CA$388.75K | ▼ -66.4% |
| 2023 | -2.74x | CA$-1.51 Million | CA$552.50K | ▲ +47.4% |
| 2022 | -5.21x | CA$-1.60 Million | CA$307.09K | ▼ -155.0% |
| 2021 | -2.04x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$683.47K | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2020 | -1.94x | CA$-793.44K | CA$408.32K | ▼ -29.2% |
| 2019 | -1.50x | CA$-817.40K | CA$543.31K | ▲ +32.0% |
| 2018 | -2.21x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$486.64K | ▼ -82.0% |
| 2017 | -1.22x | CA$-629.47K | CA$517.44K | ▼ -64.0% |
| 2016 | -0.74x | CA$-591.52K | CA$797.58K | ▼ -219.8% |
| 2015 | -0.23x | CA$-125.78K | CA$542.38K | ▲ +64.4% |
| 2014 | -0.65x | CA$-386.66K | CA$593.60K | ▼ -441.6% |
| 2013 | -0.12x | CA$-105.77K | CA$879.48K | ▲ +87.8% |
| 2011 | -0.99x | CA$-752.38K | CA$762.26K | ▼ -774.5% |
| 2010 | -0.11x | CA$-63.86K | CA$565.75K | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2009 | -0.28x | CA$-50.61K | CA$179.00K | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2008 | -0.60x | CA$-120.65K | CA$199.52K | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2007 | -4.58x | CA$-125.18K | CA$27.32K | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2006 | -6.82x | CA$-259.53K | CA$38.04K | ▼ -9729.5% |
| 2005 | -0.07x | CA$-13.09K | CA$188.58K | ▲ +86.3% |
| 2004 | -0.51x | CA$-91.49K | CA$180.35K | ▼ -1992.8% |
| 2003 | -0.02x | CA$-3.94K | CA$162.63K | ▲ +61.1% |
| 2002 | -0.06x | CA$-31.11K | CA$498.63K | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2001 | -0.92x | CA$-21.05K | CA$22.78K | — |