Honey Badger Silver Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Honey Badger Silver Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Honey Badger Silver Inc (TUF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.27x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.00 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$791.94K) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Honey Badger Silver Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Honey Badger Silver Inc (2001–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Honey Badger Silver Inc from 2001 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Honey Badger Silver Inc across 23 annual periods. Check TUF cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Honey Badger Silver Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2024)
Honey Badger Silver Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Honey Badger Silver Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Honey Badger Silver Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -4.56x | CA$-1.77 Million | CA$388.75K | ▼ -66.4% |
| 2023 | -2.74x | CA$-1.51 Million | CA$552.50K | ▲ +47.4% |
| 2022 | -5.21x | CA$-1.60 Million | CA$307.09K | ▼ -155.0% |
| 2021 | -2.04x | CA$-1.40 Million | CA$683.47K | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2020 | -1.94x | CA$-793.44K | CA$408.32K | ▼ -29.2% |
| 2019 | -1.50x | CA$-817.40K | CA$543.31K | ▲ +32.0% |
| 2018 | -2.21x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$486.64K | ▼ -82.0% |
| 2017 | -1.22x | CA$-629.47K | CA$517.44K | ▼ -64.0% |
| 2016 | -0.74x | CA$-591.52K | CA$797.58K | ▼ -219.8% |
| 2015 | -0.23x | CA$-125.78K | CA$542.38K | ▲ +64.4% |
| 2014 | -0.65x | CA$-386.66K | CA$593.60K | ▼ -441.6% |
| 2013 | -0.12x | CA$-105.77K | CA$879.48K | ▲ +87.8% |
| 2011 | -0.99x | CA$-752.38K | CA$762.26K | ▼ -774.5% |
| 2010 | -0.11x | CA$-63.86K | CA$565.75K | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2009 | -0.28x | CA$-50.61K | CA$179.00K | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2008 | -0.60x | CA$-120.65K | CA$199.52K | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2007 | -4.58x | CA$-125.18K | CA$27.32K | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2006 | -6.82x | CA$-259.53K | CA$38.04K | ▼ -9729.5% |
| 2005 | -0.07x | CA$-13.09K | CA$188.58K | ▲ +86.3% |
| 2004 | -0.51x | CA$-91.49K | CA$180.35K | ▼ -1992.8% |
| 2003 | -0.02x | CA$-3.94K | CA$162.63K | ▲ +61.1% |
| 2002 | -0.06x | CA$-31.11K | CA$498.63K | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2001 | -0.92x | CA$-21.05K | CA$22.78K | — |