Honey Badger Silver Inc (TUF) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Honey Badger Silver Inc (TUF) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 100.0% as of September 2025. Working capital of CA$1.98 Million (current assets of CA$2.77 Million minus current liabilities of CA$791.94K) is measured against net assets of CA$1.98 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See how leveraged is Honey Badger Silver Inc's balance sheet to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Honey Badger Silver Inc Working Capital to Net Assets (2001–2024)
This chart shows how Honey Badger Silver Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2001 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting working capital of CA$1.98 Million against net assets of CA$1.98 Million CAD. Check Honey Badger Silver Inc (TUF) tangible equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Honey Badger Silver Inc (2001–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Honey Badger Silver Inc from 2001 to 2024, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see TUF company net worth.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 100.0% | CA$260.61K | CA$260.61K | CA$649.37K | CA$388.75K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | CA$-208.49K | CA$-208.49K | CA$344.01K | CA$552.50K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | CA$331.89K | CA$331.89K | CA$638.98K | CA$307.09K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | CA$1.76 Million | CA$1.76 Million | CA$2.44 Million | CA$683.47K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | CA$319.89K | CA$319.89K | CA$728.21K | CA$408.32K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | CA$-113.71K | CA$-113.71K | CA$429.60K | CA$543.31K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | CA$670.21K | CA$670.21K | CA$1.16 Million | CA$486.64K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | CA$-116.34K | CA$-116.34K | CA$401.11K | CA$517.44K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | CA$-703.56K | CA$-703.56K | CA$94.02K | CA$797.58K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$-140.65K | CA$-140.65K | CA$401.73K | CA$542.38K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$-284.88K | CA$-284.88K | CA$308.73K | CA$593.60K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$-447.62K | CA$-447.62K | CA$431.86K | CA$879.48K | ▲ +100.7 pp |
| 2012 | -0.7% | CA$-12.76K | CA$1.76 Million | CA$776.77K | CA$789.53K | ▼ -18.2 pp |
| 2011 | 17.5% | CA$361.73K | CA$2.07 Million | CA$1.12 Million | CA$762.26K | ▼ -610.4 pp |
| 2010 | 627.9% | CA$-389.71K | CA$-62.07K | CA$176.04K | CA$565.75K | ▲ +609.1 pp |
| 2009 | 18.8% | CA$55.86K | CA$296.95K | CA$234.86K | CA$179.00K | ▲ +69.1 pp |
| 2008 | -50.3% | CA$-170.30K | CA$338.63K | CA$29.22K | CA$199.52K | ▼ -59.9 pp |
| 2007 | 9.6% | CA$66.79K | CA$695.41K | CA$94.11K | CA$27.32K | ▼ -19.4 pp |
| 2006 | 29.0% | CA$339.20K | CA$1.17 Million | CA$377.24K | CA$38.04K | ▲ +49.3 pp |
| 2005 | -20.3% | CA$-66.75K | CA$328.44K | CA$121.84K | CA$188.58K | ▼ -7.0 pp |
| 2004 | -13.3% | CA$-77.63K | CA$582.10K | CA$23.70K | CA$101.33K | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2003 | -15.1% | CA$-75.48K | CA$498.89K | CA$1.84K | CA$77.31K | ▼ -12.5 pp |
| 2002 | -2.6% | CA$-27.12K | CA$1.03 Million | CA$9.69K | CA$36.81K | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2001 | -2.2% | CA$-20.84K | CA$935.13K | CA$1.94K | CA$22.78K | — |