Visionstate Corp (VIS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Visionstate Corp (VIS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.30x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-203.02K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$667.66K) in one year. See VIS financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Visionstate Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Visionstate Corp across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Visionstate Corp (VIS) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Visionstate Corp (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Visionstate Corp. Check Visionstate Corp (VIS) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.60x | CA$-809.97K | CA$504.84K | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2024 | -1.30x | CA$-671.66K | CA$517.13K | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2023 | -1.58x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$641.27K | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2022 | -1.06x | CA$-766.04K | CA$720.13K | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2021 | -0.65x | CA$-536.56K | CA$830.21K | ▼ -178.6% |
| 2020 | -0.23x | CA$-316.36K | CA$1.36 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 2019 | -0.51x | CA$-510.50K | CA$998.91K | ▲ +61.3% |
| 2018 | -1.32x | CA$-923.72K | CA$700.03K | ▼ -217.7% |
| 2017 | -0.42x | CA$-453.51K | CA$1.09 Million | ▼ -325.8% |
| 2016 | -0.10x | CA$-92.67K | CA$949.99K | ▼ -233.0% |
| 2016 | -0.03x | CA$-6.57K | CA$224.11K | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2015 | -0.93x | CA$-752.14K | CA$812.35K | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2015 | -1.44x | CA$-216.32K | CA$150.24K | ▼ -124.6% |
| 2014 | -0.64x | CA$-433.36K | CA$675.93K | ▲ +90.3% |
| 2014 | -6.64x | CA$-269.90K | CA$40.64K | ▼ -1907.7% |
| 2013 | -0.33x | CA$-268.83K | CA$812.80K | ▲ +97.1% |
| 2013 | -11.35x | CA$-102.28K | CA$9.01K | ▼ -2396.3% |
| 2012 | -0.45x | CA$-346.05K | CA$761.16K | ▼ -199.2% |
| 2011 | -0.15x | CA$-136.68K | CA$899.38K | ▼ -670.0% |
| 2010 | -0.02x | CA$-13.06K | CA$661.58K | ▲ +67.4% |
| 2009 | -0.06x | CA$-36.58K | CA$605.01K | ▲ +94.2% |
| 2008 | -1.04x | CA$-420.18K | CA$402.94K | ▲ +46.2% |
| 2007 | -1.94x | CA$-540.88K | CA$278.82K | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2006 | -3.45x | CA$-654.30K | CA$189.60K | ▼ -259.2% |
| 2005 | -0.96x | CA$-321.78K | CA$334.94K | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2004 | -0.93x | CA$-357.04K | CA$383.19K | ▼ -206.5% |
| 2003 | -0.30x | CA$-205.08K | CA$674.61K | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2002 | -0.29x | CA$-145.75K | CA$510.26K | ▲ +83.9% |
| 2001 | -1.77x | CA$-420.65K | CA$237.70K | — |