Visionstate Corp (VIS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Visionstate Corp (VIS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.30x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-203.02K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$667.66K) in one year. See VIS free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Visionstate Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Visionstate Corp across 29 annual periods. Also explore Visionstate Corp net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Visionstate Corp (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Visionstate Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see VIS market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.60x | CA$-809.97K | CA$504.84K | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2024 | -1.30x | CA$-671.66K | CA$517.13K | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2023 | -1.58x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$641.27K | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2022 | -1.06x | CA$-766.04K | CA$720.13K | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2021 | -0.65x | CA$-536.56K | CA$830.21K | ▼ -178.6% |
| 2020 | -0.23x | CA$-316.36K | CA$1.36 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 2019 | -0.51x | CA$-510.50K | CA$998.91K | ▲ +61.3% |
| 2018 | -1.32x | CA$-923.72K | CA$700.03K | ▼ -217.7% |
| 2017 | -0.42x | CA$-453.51K | CA$1.09 Million | ▼ -325.8% |
| 2016 | -0.10x | CA$-92.67K | CA$949.99K | ▼ -233.0% |
| 2016 | -0.03x | CA$-6.57K | CA$224.11K | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2015 | -0.93x | CA$-752.14K | CA$812.35K | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2015 | -1.44x | CA$-216.32K | CA$150.24K | ▼ -124.6% |
| 2014 | -0.64x | CA$-433.36K | CA$675.93K | ▲ +90.3% |
| 2014 | -6.64x | CA$-269.90K | CA$40.64K | ▼ -1907.7% |
| 2013 | -0.33x | CA$-268.83K | CA$812.80K | ▲ +97.1% |
| 2013 | -11.35x | CA$-102.28K | CA$9.01K | ▼ -2396.3% |
| 2012 | -0.45x | CA$-346.05K | CA$761.16K | ▼ -199.2% |
| 2011 | -0.15x | CA$-136.68K | CA$899.38K | ▼ -670.0% |
| 2010 | -0.02x | CA$-13.06K | CA$661.58K | ▲ +67.4% |
| 2009 | -0.06x | CA$-36.58K | CA$605.01K | ▲ +94.2% |
| 2008 | -1.04x | CA$-420.18K | CA$402.94K | ▲ +46.2% |
| 2007 | -1.94x | CA$-540.88K | CA$278.82K | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2006 | -3.45x | CA$-654.30K | CA$189.60K | ▼ -259.2% |
| 2005 | -0.96x | CA$-321.78K | CA$334.94K | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2004 | -0.93x | CA$-357.04K | CA$383.19K | ▼ -206.5% |
| 2003 | -0.30x | CA$-205.08K | CA$674.61K | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2002 | -0.29x | CA$-145.75K | CA$510.26K | ▲ +83.9% |
| 2001 | -1.77x | CA$-420.65K | CA$237.70K | — |