Visionstate Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Visionstate Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Visionstate Corp (VIS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.30x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-203.02K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$667.66K) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Visionstate Corp to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Visionstate Corp (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Visionstate Corp from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Visionstate Corp across 29 annual periods. Check VIS cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Visionstate Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Visionstate Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Visionstate Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Visionstate Corp (VIS) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.60x | CA$-809.97K | CA$504.84K | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2024 | -1.30x | CA$-671.66K | CA$517.13K | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2023 | -1.58x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$641.27K | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2022 | -1.06x | CA$-766.04K | CA$720.13K | ▼ -64.6% |
| 2021 | -0.65x | CA$-536.56K | CA$830.21K | ▼ -178.6% |
| 2020 | -0.23x | CA$-316.36K | CA$1.36 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 2019 | -0.51x | CA$-510.50K | CA$998.91K | ▲ +61.3% |
| 2018 | -1.32x | CA$-923.72K | CA$700.03K | ▼ -217.7% |
| 2017 | -0.42x | CA$-453.51K | CA$1.09 Million | ▼ -325.8% |
| 2016 | -0.10x | CA$-92.67K | CA$949.99K | ▼ -233.0% |
| 2016 | -0.03x | CA$-6.57K | CA$224.11K | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2015 | -0.93x | CA$-752.14K | CA$812.35K | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2015 | -1.44x | CA$-216.32K | CA$150.24K | ▼ -124.6% |
| 2014 | -0.64x | CA$-433.36K | CA$675.93K | ▲ +90.3% |
| 2014 | -6.64x | CA$-269.90K | CA$40.64K | ▼ -1907.7% |
| 2013 | -0.33x | CA$-268.83K | CA$812.80K | ▲ +97.1% |
| 2013 | -11.35x | CA$-102.28K | CA$9.01K | ▼ -2396.3% |
| 2012 | -0.45x | CA$-346.05K | CA$761.16K | ▼ -199.2% |
| 2011 | -0.15x | CA$-136.68K | CA$899.38K | ▼ -670.0% |
| 2010 | -0.02x | CA$-13.06K | CA$661.58K | ▲ +67.4% |
| 2009 | -0.06x | CA$-36.58K | CA$605.01K | ▲ +94.2% |
| 2008 | -1.04x | CA$-420.18K | CA$402.94K | ▲ +46.2% |
| 2007 | -1.94x | CA$-540.88K | CA$278.82K | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2006 | -3.45x | CA$-654.30K | CA$189.60K | ▼ -259.2% |
| 2005 | -0.96x | CA$-321.78K | CA$334.94K | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2004 | -0.93x | CA$-357.04K | CA$383.19K | ▼ -206.5% |
| 2003 | -0.30x | CA$-205.08K | CA$674.61K | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2002 | -0.29x | CA$-145.75K | CA$510.26K | ▲ +83.9% |
| 2001 | -1.77x | CA$-420.65K | CA$237.70K | — |