Visionstate Corp (VIS) — Net Asset Quality Index
Visionstate Corp (VIS) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -147.0% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$270.34K minus total liabilities of CA$667.66K yields net assets of CA$-397.32K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Also explore Visionstate Corp assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Visionstate Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2001–2025)
This chart shows how Visionstate Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 29 annual periods from 2001 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at -147.0%, representing net assets of CA$-397.32K against total assets of CA$270.34K CAD. See VIS net working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Visionstate Corp (2001–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Visionstate Corp from 2001 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see VIS stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -164.0% | CA$-313.62K | CA$191.21K | CA$504.84K | ▼ -201.4 pp |
| 2024 | 37.4% | CA$308.94K | CA$826.07K | CA$517.13K | ▲ +103.3 pp |
| 2023 | -65.9% | CA$-254.65K | CA$386.62K | CA$641.27K | ▼ -92.1 pp |
| 2022 | 26.3% | CA$256.62K | CA$976.75K | CA$720.13K | ▼ -17.8 pp |
| 2021 | 44.1% | CA$655.03K | CA$1.49 Million | CA$830.21K | ▲ +413.9 pp |
| 2020 | -369.8% | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$290.28K | CA$1.36 Million | ▼ -98.0 pp |
| 2019 | -271.8% | CA$-730.23K | CA$268.69K | CA$998.91K | ▼ -216.7 pp |
| 2018 | -55.1% | CA$-248.58K | CA$451.45K | CA$700.03K | ▲ +3954.3 pp |
| 2017 | -4009.4% | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$26.57K | CA$1.09 Million | ▼ -3674.8 pp |
| 2016 | -334.6% | CA$-731.41K | CA$218.58K | CA$949.99K | ▼ -375.2 pp |
| 2016 | 40.6% | CA$153.02K | CA$377.13K | CA$224.11K | ▲ +404.9 pp |
| 2015 | -364.3% | CA$-637.38K | CA$174.97K | CA$812.35K | ▼ -432.1 pp |
| 2015 | 67.8% | CA$316.95K | CA$467.19K | CA$150.24K | ▲ +197.1 pp |
| 2014 | -129.2% | CA$-381.06K | CA$294.87K | CA$675.93K | ▼ -206.1 pp |
| 2014 | 76.8% | CA$134.70K | CA$175.35K | CA$40.64K | ▲ +538.8 pp |
| 2013 | -462.0% | CA$-668.17K | CA$144.64K | CA$812.80K | ▼ -289.0 pp |
| 2013 | -173.0% | CA$-5.71K | CA$3.30K | CA$9.01K | ▲ +263.2 pp |
| 2012 | -436.2% | CA$-619.21K | CA$141.95K | CA$761.16K | ▲ +159.1 pp |
| 2011 | -595.3% | CA$-770.04K | CA$129.35K | CA$899.38K | ▼ -157.8 pp |
| 2010 | -437.5% | CA$-538.49K | CA$123.08K | CA$661.58K | ▼ -370.9 pp |
| 2009 | -66.6% | CA$-241.79K | CA$363.22K | CA$605.01K | ▼ -71.5 pp |
| 2008 | 4.9% | CA$20.96K | CA$423.89K | CA$402.94K | ▼ -48.4 pp |
| 2007 | 53.3% | CA$318.62K | CA$597.44K | CA$278.82K | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2006 | 67.1% | CA$387.16K | CA$576.76K | CA$189.60K | ▲ +199.3 pp |
| 2005 | -132.2% | CA$-190.67K | CA$144.27K | CA$334.94K | ▲ +228.4 pp |
| 2004 | -360.6% | CA$-299.99K | CA$83.20K | CA$383.19K | ▲ +76.1 pp |
| 2003 | -436.7% | CA$-548.91K | CA$125.69K | CA$674.61K | ▼ -292.3 pp |
| 2002 | -144.4% | CA$-301.50K | CA$208.76K | CA$510.26K | ▼ -175.5 pp |
| 2001 | 31.1% | CA$107.19K | CA$344.89K | CA$237.70K | — |