Current Water Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Current Water Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Current Water Technologies Inc (WATR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$9.96K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.66 Million) in one year. Check how high is Current Water Technologies Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Current Water Technologies Inc (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Current Water Technologies Inc from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Current Water Technologies Inc across 28 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Current Water Technologies Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Current Water Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
Current Water Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Current Water Technologies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see WATR cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.30x | CA$-508.65K | CA$1.67 Million | ▼ -463.7% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | CA$168.31K | CA$2.01 Million | ▲ +130.3% |
| 2022 | -0.28x | CA$-377.33K | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +64.8% |
| 2021 | -0.78x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$1.28 Million | ▼ -165.2% |
| 2020 | -0.30x | CA$-413.62K | CA$1.40 Million | ▼ -478.5% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | CA$117.07K | CA$1.50 Million | ▲ +106.7% |
| 2018 | -1.16x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$1.39 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2017 | -1.10x | CA$-473.21K | CA$430.14K | ▲ +77.8% |
| 2016 | -4.96x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$207.69K | ▲ +63.6% |
| 2015 | -13.62x | CA$-862.73K | CA$63.36K | ▼ -519.7% |
| 2014 | -2.20x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$469.47K | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2013 | -1.66x | CA$-749.68K | CA$452.37K | ▲ +35.0% |
| 2012 | -2.55x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$424.66K | ▲ +82.2% |
| 2011 | -14.34x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$126.33K | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2010 | -11.79x | CA$-1.44 Million | CA$122.21K | ▼ -619.1% |
| 2009 | -1.64x | CA$-1.44 Million | CA$879.99K | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2008 | -2.00x | CA$-2.40 Million | CA$1.20 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 2007 | -10.00x | CA$-1.66 Million | CA$165.67K | ▼ -351.5% |
| 2006 | -2.22x | CA$-728.75K | CA$328.97K | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2005 | -2.20x | CA$-399.50K | CA$181.91K | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2004 | -2.50x | CA$-666.21K | CA$266.44K | ▼ -386.0% |
| 2003 | -0.51x | CA$-87.23K | CA$169.55K | ▼ -300.0% |
| 2001 | 0.26x | CA$54.00K | CA$209.98K | ▲ +215.8% |
| 2000 | -0.22x | CA$-41.29K | CA$185.88K | ▲ +89.6% |
| 1999 | -2.13x | CA$-324.99K | CA$152.52K | ▼ -480.2% |
| 1998 | -0.37x | CA$-89.00K | CA$242.34K | ▼ -3.4% |
| 1997 | -0.36x | CA$-47.66K | CA$134.24K | ▼ -338.0% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | CA$41.45K | CA$277.78K | — |