Current Water Technologies Inc (WATR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Current Water Technologies Inc (WATR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$9.96K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.66 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Current Water Technologies Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Current Water Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Current Water Technologies Inc across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Current Water Technologies Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Current Water Technologies Inc (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Current Water Technologies Inc. Check Current Water Technologies Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.30x | CA$-508.65K | CA$1.67 Million | ▼ -463.7% |
| 2023 | 0.08x | CA$168.31K | CA$2.01 Million | ▲ +130.3% |
| 2022 | -0.28x | CA$-377.33K | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +64.8% |
| 2021 | -0.78x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$1.28 Million | ▼ -165.2% |
| 2020 | -0.30x | CA$-413.62K | CA$1.40 Million | ▼ -478.5% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | CA$117.07K | CA$1.50 Million | ▲ +106.7% |
| 2018 | -1.16x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$1.39 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2017 | -1.10x | CA$-473.21K | CA$430.14K | ▲ +77.8% |
| 2016 | -4.96x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$207.69K | ▲ +63.6% |
| 2015 | -13.62x | CA$-862.73K | CA$63.36K | ▼ -519.7% |
| 2014 | -2.20x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$469.47K | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2013 | -1.66x | CA$-749.68K | CA$452.37K | ▲ +35.0% |
| 2012 | -2.55x | CA$-1.08 Million | CA$424.66K | ▲ +82.2% |
| 2011 | -14.34x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$126.33K | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2010 | -11.79x | CA$-1.44 Million | CA$122.21K | ▼ -619.1% |
| 2009 | -1.64x | CA$-1.44 Million | CA$879.99K | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2008 | -2.00x | CA$-2.40 Million | CA$1.20 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 2007 | -10.00x | CA$-1.66 Million | CA$165.67K | ▼ -351.5% |
| 2006 | -2.22x | CA$-728.75K | CA$328.97K | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2005 | -2.20x | CA$-399.50K | CA$181.91K | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2004 | -2.50x | CA$-666.21K | CA$266.44K | ▼ -386.0% |
| 2003 | -0.51x | CA$-87.23K | CA$169.55K | ▼ -300.0% |
| 2001 | 0.26x | CA$54.00K | CA$209.98K | ▲ +215.8% |
| 2000 | -0.22x | CA$-41.29K | CA$185.88K | ▲ +89.6% |
| 1999 | -2.13x | CA$-324.99K | CA$152.52K | ▼ -480.2% |
| 1998 | -0.37x | CA$-89.00K | CA$242.34K | ▼ -3.4% |
| 1997 | -0.36x | CA$-47.66K | CA$134.24K | ▼ -338.0% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | CA$41.45K | CA$277.78K | — |