Edgewater Wireless Systems Inc (YFI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Edgewater Wireless Systems Inc (YFI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.12x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-193.57K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.57 Million) in one year. See YFI free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Edgewater Wireless Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Edgewater Wireless Systems Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Edgewater Wireless Systems Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Edgewater Wireless Systems Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Edgewater Wireless Systems Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Edgewater Wireless Systems Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.41x | CA$-744.59K | CA$1.80 Million | ▼ -119.3% |
| 2024 | -0.19x | CA$-364.57K | CA$1.94 Million | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2023 | -0.28x | CA$-679.98K | CA$2.42 Million | ▲ +60.0% |
| 2022 | -0.70x | CA$-1.42 Million | CA$2.02 Million | ▼ -219.3% |
| 2021 | -0.22x | CA$-515.32K | CA$2.34 Million | ▲ +52.7% |
| 2020 | -0.47x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$2.37 Million | ▲ +46.4% |
| 2019 | -0.87x | CA$-1.85 Million | CA$2.13 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2018 | -1.89x | CA$-2.98 Million | CA$1.57 Million | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2017 | -1.56x | CA$-2.88 Million | CA$1.84 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2016 | -0.97x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$1.78 Million | ▼ -478.4% |
| 2015 | -0.17x | CA$-356.47K | CA$2.13 Million | ▼ -76.8% |
| 2014 | -0.09x | CA$-212.10K | CA$2.24 Million | ▲ +94.6% |
| 2013 | -1.74x | CA$-2.98 Million | CA$1.71 Million | ▲ +37.2% |
| 2012 | -2.77x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$585.35K | ▼ -1794.2% |
| 2011 | -0.15x | CA$-15.91K | CA$108.77K | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2010 | -0.35x | CA$-33.90K | CA$95.64K | ▼ -4300.7% |
| 2009 | -0.01x | CA$-12.12K | CA$1.50 Million | ▲ +88.0% |
| 2008 | -0.07x | CA$-183.77K | CA$2.74 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2007 | -0.09x | CA$-287.26K | CA$3.07 Million | ▼ -12.0% |
| 2006 | -0.08x | CA$-205.39K | CA$2.46 Million | ▼ -172.6% |
| 2005 | -0.03x | CA$-69.04K | CA$2.25 Million | ▼ -220.4% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | CA$48.55K | CA$1.91 Million | ▲ +133.4% |
| 2003 | -0.08x | CA$-122.22K | CA$1.60 Million | ▲ +73.3% |
| 2002 | -0.29x | CA$-454.54K | CA$1.59 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2001 | -0.38x | CA$-440.78K | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2000 | -0.28x | CA$-500.00K | CA$1.80 Million | ▼ -75.9% |
| 1999 | -0.16x | CA$-300.00K | CA$1.90 Million | ▲ +66.2% |
| 1998 | -0.47x | CA$-700.00K | CA$1.50 Million | ▲ +13.3% |
| 1997 | -0.54x | CA$-700.00K | CA$1.30 Million | — |