Magna Polonia SA (06N) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: -0.08x

Magna Polonia SA (06N) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of zł-700.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (zł8.86 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Magna Polonia SA to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.08x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

zł-700.00K
PLN

Total Liabilities

zł8.86 Million
PLN

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

Magna Polonia SA Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Magna Polonia SA across 17 annual periods. Also explore Magna Polonia SA balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Magna Polonia SA (2008–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Magna Polonia SA. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 06N market cap.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (PLN) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -0.24x zł-2.58 Million zł10.62 Million ▼ -101.3%
2023 18.24x zł66.18 Million zł3.63 Million ▲ +7183.4%
2022 -0.26x zł-1.35 Million zł5.24 Million ▲ +17.5%
2021 -0.31x zł-1.92 Million zł6.16 Million ▼ -157.9%
2020 0.54x zł3.23 Million zł6.00 Million ▲ +453.4%
2019 -0.15x zł-1.15 Million zł7.53 Million ▼ -3.0%
2018 -0.15x zł-1.29 Million zł8.69 Million ▲ +35.4%
2017 -0.23x zł-1.78 Million zł7.78 Million ▼ -115.9%
2016 -0.11x zł-573.00K zł5.40 Million ▲ +88.3%
2015 -0.91x zł-2.33 Million zł2.56 Million ▼ -344.7%
2014 -0.20x zł-626.00K zł3.06 Million ▲ +55.4%
2013 -0.46x zł-2.09 Million zł4.55 Million ▼ -1448.5%
2012 0.03x zł3.31 Million zł97.35 Million ▼ -59.8%
2011 0.08x zł6.50 Million zł76.70 Million ▲ +204.8%
2010 -0.08x zł-5.42 Million zł66.99 Million ▼ -191.3%
2009 0.09x zł6.51 Million zł73.55 Million ▼ -65.8%
2008 0.26x zł15.68 Million zł60.50 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.