Betacom S.A. (BCM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: 0.07x

Betacom S.A. (BCM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of zł4.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (zł62.09 Million) in one year. See Betacom S.A. free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.07x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

zł4.16 Million
PLN

Total Liabilities

zł62.09 Million
PLN

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Betacom S.A. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Betacom S.A. across 17 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Betacom S.A. operating cash flow efficiency.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Betacom S.A. (2008–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Betacom S.A.. Check Betacom S.A. cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (PLN) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.32x zł15.06 Million zł47.42 Million ▲ +80.6%
2023 0.18x zł5.12 Million zł29.10 Million ▼ -44.4%
2022 0.32x zł8.67 Million zł27.43 Million ▲ +969.1%
2021 -0.04x zł-1.25 Million zł34.23 Million ▼ -114.5%
2020 0.25x zł5.37 Million zł21.46 Million ▲ +8.3%
2019 0.23x zł4.27 Million zł18.48 Million ▲ +35.9%
2018 0.17x zł3.33 Million zł19.60 Million ▼ -19.7%
2017 0.21x zł7.78 Million zł36.70 Million ▲ +98.7%
2016 0.11x zł3.59 Million zł33.69 Million ▲ +42.5%
2015 0.07x zł2.63 Million zł35.18 Million ▲ +164.1%
2014 -0.12x zł-4.29 Million zł36.73 Million ▼ -147.0%
2013 0.25x zł5.47 Million zł22.03 Million ▼ -19.5%
2012 0.31x zł6.44 Million zł20.86 Million ▲ +14.9%
2011 0.27x zł4.43 Million zł16.48 Million ▲ +4332.8%
2010 -0.01x zł-128.00K zł20.18 Million ▲ +0.0%
2009 -0.01x zł-128.00K zł20.18 Million ▼ -103.3%
2008 0.19x zł3.15 Million zł16.46 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.