MFO SA (MFO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Latest as of March 2026:
0.07x
MFO SA (MFO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of zł20.14 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (zł309.50 Million) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of MFO SA to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
0.07x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities
Operating Cash Flow
zł20.14 Million
PLN
Total Liabilities
zł309.50 Million
PLN
Data as of
Mar 2026
Most recent filing
MFO SA Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for MFO SA across 14 annual periods. Also explore MFO SA asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for MFO SA (2012–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for MFO SA. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MFO SA market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (PLN) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.08x | zł-20.91 Million | zł267.82 Million | ▼ -225.1% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | zł13.78 Million | zł220.63 Million | ▼ -71.9% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | zł44.00 Million | zł197.83 Million | ▼ -69.1% |
| 2022 | 0.72x | zł105.46 Million | zł146.60 Million | ▲ +999.6% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | zł15.76 Million | zł240.85 Million | ▼ -77.5% |
| 2020 | 0.29x | zł36.09 Million | zł124.10 Million | ▲ +79.1% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | zł20.44 Million | zł125.88 Million | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | zł13.53 Million | zł117.75 Million | ▲ +290.5% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | zł2.63 Million | zł89.34 Million | ▼ -92.6% |
| 2016 | 0.40x | zł28.54 Million | zł71.76 Million | ▲ +1431.2% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | zł1.37 Million | zł52.79 Million | ▼ -78.8% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | zł5.73 Million | zł46.71 Million | ▲ +842.4% |
| 2013 | -0.02x | zł-529.00K | zł32.04 Million | ▼ -110.2% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | zł7.58 Million | zł46.78 Million | — |
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.