Miraculum SA (MIR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.01x

Miraculum SA (MIR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of zł336.25K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (zł29.04 Million) in one year. See MIR FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.01x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

zł336.25K
PLN

Total Liabilities

zł29.04 Million
PLN

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Miraculum SA Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Miraculum SA across 17 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Miraculum SA.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Miraculum SA (2008–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Miraculum SA. Check Miraculum SA earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (PLN) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -0.03x zł-910.84K zł30.87 Million ▼ -360.6%
2023 -0.01x zł-243.03K zł37.93 Million ▲ +63.2%
2022 -0.02x zł-593.88K zł34.16 Million ▲ +84.6%
2021 -0.11x zł-4.02 Million zł35.58 Million ▼ -27.9%
2020 -0.09x zł-2.90 Million zł32.86 Million ▲ +43.7%
2019 -0.16x zł-4.99 Million zł31.80 Million ▼ -4.9%
2018 -0.15x zł-4.20 Million zł28.05 Million ▲ +63.3%
2017 -0.41x zł-14.14 Million zł34.68 Million ▼ -614.2%
2016 -0.06x zł-2.87 Million zł50.33 Million ▲ +34.2%
2015 -0.09x zł-3.76 Million zł43.29 Million ▼ -286.7%
2014 -0.02x zł-1.08 Million zł48.31 Million ▲ +54.1%
2013 -0.05x zł-2.26 Million zł46.23 Million ▲ +56.4%
2012 -0.11x zł-7.20 Million zł64.23 Million ▼ -97.7%
2011 -0.06x zł-2.07 Million zł36.48 Million ▲ +15.9%
2010 -0.07x zł-3.87 Million zł57.42 Million ▼ -59.6%
2009 -0.04x zł-3.15 Million zł74.61 Million ▼ -148.6%
2008 0.09x zł7.11 Million zł81.81 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.