MOJ S.A (MOJ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: 0.01x

MOJ S.A (MOJ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of zł342.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (zł43.57 Million) in one year. See MOJ FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.01x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

zł342.00K
PLN

Total Liabilities

zł43.57 Million
PLN

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

MOJ S.A Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for MOJ S.A across 18 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does MOJ S.A generate cash.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for MOJ S.A (2008–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for MOJ S.A. Check how high is MOJ S.A's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (PLN) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.15x zł5.86 Million zł38.00 Million ▲ +720.8%
2024 -0.02x zł-1.02 Million zł41.18 Million ▼ -116.0%
2023 0.16x zł6.43 Million zł41.30 Million ▲ +15.7%
2022 0.13x zł4.51 Million zł33.54 Million ▼ -64.1%
2021 0.38x zł9.54 Million zł25.42 Million ▲ +399.1%
2020 -0.13x zł-2.48 Million zł19.80 Million ▼ -571.6%
2019 0.03x zł709.00K zł26.66 Million ▼ -37.0%
2018 0.04x zł1.10 Million zł25.97 Million ▼ -73.8%
2017 0.16x zł3.79 Million zł23.56 Million ▲ +34.2%
2016 0.12x zł3.05 Million zł25.43 Million ▲ +250.1%
2015 0.03x zł959.00K zł27.99 Million ▲ +184.5%
2014 -0.04x zł-1.15 Million zł28.25 Million ▼ -112.6%
2013 0.32x zł9.87 Million zł30.63 Million ▼ -17.4%
2012 0.39x zł2.69 Million zł6.91 Million ▲ +183.9%
2011 0.14x zł1.56 Million zł11.38 Million ▼ -21.9%
2010 0.18x zł1.25 Million zł7.12 Million ▲ +297.6%
2009 -0.09x zł-330.00K zł3.71 Million ▼ -126.1%
2008 0.34x zł1.27 Million zł3.71 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.