Muza S.A (MZA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: 0.17x

Muza S.A (MZA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of zł3.23 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (zł18.80 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Muza S.A to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.17x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

zł3.23 Million
PLN

Total Liabilities

zł18.80 Million
PLN

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

Muza S.A Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Muza S.A across 18 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Muza S.A (MZA) cash flow conversion.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Muza S.A (2008–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Muza S.A. Check earnings quality score of Muza S.A to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (PLN) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.22x zł4.02 Million zł18.43 Million ▲ +9.6%
2024 0.20x zł3.78 Million zł19.02 Million ▼ -68.8%
2023 0.64x zł16.45 Million zł25.83 Million ▲ +98.1%
2022 0.32x zł6.41 Million zł19.95 Million ▼ -14.2%
2021 0.37x zł6.07 Million zł16.22 Million ▲ +80.5%
2020 0.21x zł3.91 Million zł18.87 Million ▲ +202.9%
2019 0.07x zł1.12 Million zł16.34 Million ▼ -62.9%
2018 0.18x zł3.13 Million zł16.94 Million ▼ -52.7%
2017 0.39x zł6.37 Million zł16.33 Million ▲ +110.7%
2016 0.19x zł3.65 Million zł19.70 Million ▼ -3.1%
2015 0.19x zł3.72 Million zł19.44 Million ▲ +26.1%
2014 0.15x zł2.73 Million zł18.02 Million ▲ +95.4%
2013 0.08x zł1.42 Million zł18.24 Million ▲ +169.6%
2012 -0.11x zł-1.56 Million zł13.98 Million ▼ -242.6%
2011 -0.03x zł-433.00K zł13.31 Million ▼ -163.8%
2010 0.05x zł1.29 Million zł25.22 Million ▲ +260.0%
2009 -0.03x zł-856.00K zł26.84 Million ▼ -215.2%
2008 0.03x zł759.00K zł27.41 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.