Prochem S.A. (PRM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2026: 0.00x

Prochem S.A. (PRM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of zł425.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (zł90.55 Million) in one year. See financial agility of Prochem S.A. to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.00x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

zł425.00K
PLN

Total Liabilities

zł90.55 Million
PLN

Data as of

Mar 2026
Most recent filing

Prochem S.A. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2009–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Prochem S.A. across 17 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Prochem S.A. (PRM) cash conversion ratio.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Prochem S.A. (2009–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Prochem S.A.. Check PRM cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (PLN) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.01x zł-1.10 Million zł94.67 Million ▼ -134.2%
2024 0.03x zł2.76 Million zł81.12 Million ▲ +120.4%
2023 -0.17x zł-15.47 Million zł92.80 Million ▼ -352.4%
2022 0.07x zł7.46 Million zł113.00 Million ▲ +286.6%
2021 -0.04x zł-5.02 Million zł141.80 Million ▼ -214.6%
2020 0.03x zł4.29 Million zł138.90 Million ▼ -86.2%
2019 0.22x zł35.95 Million zł160.76 Million ▲ +389.0%
2018 -0.08x zł-4.59 Million zł59.37 Million ▼ -110.3%
2017 0.75x zł33.70 Million zł45.06 Million ▲ +430.7%
2016 -0.23x zł-14.74 Million zł65.18 Million ▼ -286.2%
2015 0.12x zł10.85 Million zł89.34 Million ▲ +445.0%
2014 -0.04x zł-2.81 Million zł79.66 Million ▼ -132.6%
2013 0.11x zł7.54 Million zł69.81 Million ▲ +162.8%
2012 -0.17x zł-10.67 Million zł62.02 Million ▼ -233.0%
2011 0.13x zł9.67 Million zł74.73 Million ▲ +430.1%
2010 0.02x zł1.55 Million zł63.36 Million ▲ +130.5%
2009 -0.08x zł-5.78 Million zł72.22 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.