LS telcom AG (LSX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.30x

LS telcom AG (LSX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.30x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of €7.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (€23.97 Million) in one year. See LS telcom AG (LSX) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.30x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

€7.16 Million
EUR

Total Liabilities

€23.97 Million
EUR

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

LS telcom AG Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for LS telcom AG across 18 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of LS telcom AG to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for LS telcom AG (2008–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for LS telcom AG. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is LS telcom AG worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (EUR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.23x €5.55 Million €23.97 Million ▲ +8.3%
2024 0.21x €5.74 Million €26.85 Million ▼ -2.3%
2023 0.22x €5.08 Million €23.22 Million ▲ +9.1%
2022 0.20x €4.94 Million €24.62 Million ▼ -5.6%
2021 0.21x €6.17 Million €29.07 Million ▼ -23.6%
2020 0.28x €6.79 Million €24.43 Million ▼ -5.3%
2019 0.29x €4.66 Million €15.90 Million ▲ +141.1%
2018 0.12x €1.97 Million €16.20 Million ▲ +68915.5%
2017 0.00x €3.00K €17.02 Million ▼ -99.9%
2016 0.19x €3.16 Million €16.92 Million ▲ +80.8%
2015 0.10x €1.98 Million €19.21 Million ▼ -58.1%
2014 0.25x €4.30 Million €17.43 Million ▼ -44.1%
2013 0.44x €5.21 Million €11.81 Million ▲ +57.1%
2012 0.28x €2.99 Million €10.64 Million ▼ -42.0%
2011 0.48x €5.63 Million €11.62 Million ▼ -8.0%
2010 0.53x €4.31 Million €8.19 Million ▲ +143.0%
2009 0.22x €1.57 Million €7.22 Million ▲ +12.7%
2008 0.19x €1.50 Million €7.82 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.