Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS Net Asset Quality Index
Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS net asset quality index. Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS (BURCE) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 51.0% as of December 2019. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of TL143.89 Million minus total liabilities of TL70.44 Million yields net assets of TL73.45 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See BURCE total equity for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS (2005–2019)
Net asset quality index of Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS from 2005 to 2019. This chart shows how Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 15 annual periods from 2005 to 2019. As of December 2019, the index stands at 51.0%, representing net assets of TL73.45 Million against total assets of TL143.89 Million TRY. Check BURCE capital-intensive asset ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS Net Asset Quality Index by Year (2005–2019)
Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS net asset quality index by year from 2005 to 2019. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS from 2005 to 2019, covering 15 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS market cap and net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (TRY) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 51.0% | TL73.45 Million | TL143.89 Million | TL70.44 Million | ▲ +10.6 pp |
| 2018 | 40.5% | TL36.10 Million | TL89.21 Million | TL53.11 Million | ▼ -4.6 pp |
| 2017 | 45.1% | TL39.17 Million | TL86.90 Million | TL47.73 Million | ▼ -7.5 pp |
| 2016 | 52.6% | TL42.16 Million | TL80.13 Million | TL37.98 Million | ▼ -4.7 pp |
| 2015 | 57.3% | TL43.67 Million | TL76.21 Million | TL32.55 Million | ▲ +23.5 pp |
| 2014 | 33.8% | TL16.61 Million | TL49.09 Million | TL32.48 Million | ▼ -7.6 pp |
| 2013 | 41.4% | TL17.22 Million | TL41.56 Million | TL24.34 Million | ▼ -5.6 pp |
| 2012 | 47.1% | TL19.49 Million | TL41.42 Million | TL21.92 Million | ▼ -6.6 pp |
| 2011 | 53.7% | TL21.32 Million | TL39.73 Million | TL18.41 Million | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2010 | 55.0% | TL21.49 Million | TL39.07 Million | TL17.58 Million | ▲ +26.8 pp |
| 2009 | 28.2% | TL7.79 Million | TL27.57 Million | TL19.79 Million | ▼ -11.2 pp |
| 2008 | 39.5% | TL9.95 Million | TL25.20 Million | TL15.26 Million | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2007 | 41.1% | TL10.42 Million | TL25.37 Million | TL14.95 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2006 | 40.1% | TL11.79 Million | TL29.41 Million | TL17.62 Million | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2005 | 44.1% | TL12.94 Million | TL29.30 Million | TL16.37 Million | — |