Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS (BURCE) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS (BURCE) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 96.2% as of December 2019. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (TL2.78 Million) from net assets (TL73.45 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS (BURCE) working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2005–2019)
This chart shows how Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 15 annual periods from 2005 to 2019. As of December 2019, the ratio stands at 96.2%, reflecting net assets of TL73.45 Million with intangible assets of TL2.78 Million TRY. See Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS (BURCE) defensive interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS (2005–2019)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Burcelik Bursa Celik Dokum Sanayi AS from 2005 to 2019, covering 15 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see BURCE market cap overview.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (TRY) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 96.2% | TL73.45 Million | TL2.78 Million | TL143.89 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2018 | 97.9% | TL36.10 Million | TL772.60K | TL89.21 Million | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2017 | 99.5% | TL39.17 Million | TL199.01K | TL86.90 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2016 | 99.7% | TL42.16 Million | TL119.59K | TL80.13 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2015 | 99.8% | TL43.67 Million | TL94.85K | TL76.21 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2014 | 99.4% | TL16.61 Million | TL102.00K | TL49.09 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2013 | 99.3% | TL17.22 Million | TL127.00K | TL41.56 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2012 | 99.2% | TL19.49 Million | TL160.00K | TL41.42 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | TL21.32 Million | TL8.00K | TL39.73 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 99.9% | TL21.49 Million | TL13.00K | TL39.07 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2009 | 99.7% | TL7.79 Million | TL23.00K | TL27.57 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2008 | 99.9% | TL9.95 Million | TL13.00K | TL25.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 99.9% | TL10.42 Million | TL15.00K | TL25.37 Million | ▲ +7.3 pp |
| 2006 | 92.5% | TL11.79 Million | TL882.00K | TL29.41 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2005 | 90.8% | TL12.94 Million | TL1.19 Million | TL29.30 Million | — |