Duran-Dogan Basim ve Ambalaj Sanayi AS (DURDO) — Net Asset Quality Index
Duran-Dogan Basim ve Ambalaj Sanayi AS (DURDO) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 52.0% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of TL2.83 Billion minus total liabilities of TL1.36 Billion yields net assets of TL1.47 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See defensive interval ratio of Duran-Dogan Basim ve Ambalaj Sanayi AS to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Duran-Dogan Basim ve Ambalaj Sanayi AS Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2002–2024)
This chart shows how Duran-Dogan Basim ve Ambalaj Sanayi AS's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 22 annual periods from 2002 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 52.0%, representing net assets of TL1.47 Billion against total assets of TL2.83 Billion TRY. Explore Duran-Dogan Basim ve Ambalaj Sanayi AS (DURDO) cash conversion ratio to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Duran-Dogan Basim ve Ambalaj Sanayi AS (2002–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Duran-Dogan Basim ve Ambalaj Sanayi AS from 2002 to 2024, covering 22 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see DURDO market cap.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (TRY) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 56.2% | TL1.35 Billion | TL2.41 Billion | TL1.06 Billion | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2023 | 59.6% | TL1.57 Billion | TL2.63 Billion | TL1.06 Billion | ▲ +15.9 pp |
| 2022 | 43.7% | TL476.43 Million | TL1.09 Billion | TL612.71 Million | ▲ +30.6 pp |
| 2021 | 13.1% | TL71.85 Million | TL547.77 Million | TL475.92 Million | ▼ -7.4 pp |
| 2020 | 20.5% | TL76.81 Million | TL374.73 Million | TL297.92 Million | ▼ -5.5 pp |
| 2019 | 26.0% | TL70.54 Million | TL271.50 Million | TL200.96 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2018 | 26.8% | TL62.52 Million | TL233.20 Million | TL170.68 Million | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2017 | 28.2% | TL41.74 Million | TL147.96 Million | TL106.22 Million | ▲ +14.9 pp |
| 2016 | 13.3% | TL14.89 Million | TL112.23 Million | TL97.34 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2015 | 18.5% | TL20.33 Million | TL109.85 Million | TL89.52 Million | ▲ +4.2 pp |
| 2014 | 14.3% | TL14.68 Million | TL102.51 Million | TL87.83 Million | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2013 | 11.9% | TL13.07 Million | TL110.21 Million | TL97.14 Million | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2012 | 25.6% | TL21.27 Million | TL83.00 Million | TL61.73 Million | ▲ +5.9 pp |
| 2011 | 19.7% | TL14.52 Million | TL73.61 Million | TL59.09 Million | ▼ -7.3 pp |
| 2010 | 27.0% | TL11.03 Million | TL40.80 Million | TL29.77 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2009 | 25.9% | TL10.49 Million | TL40.47 Million | TL29.99 Million | ▲ +8.4 pp |
| 2007 | 17.5% | TL6.85 Million | TL39.17 Million | TL32.32 Million | ▼ -5.0 pp |
| 2006 | 22.5% | TL10.20 Million | TL45.37 Million | TL35.17 Million | ▲ +4.8 pp |
| 2005 | 17.7% | TL8.88 Million | TL50.24 Million | TL41.36 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2004 | 17.3% | TL2.40 Million | TL13.81 Million | TL11.41 Million | ▼ -15.8 pp |
| 2003 | 33.2% | TL3.84 Million | TL11.58 Million | TL7.74 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2002 | 31.9% | TL2.97 Million | TL9.31 Million | TL6.33 Million | — |