ERSU Meyve ve Gida Sanayi AS Net Asset Quality Index
ERSU Meyve ve Gida Sanayi AS net asset quality index. ERSU Meyve ve Gida Sanayi AS (ERSU) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 65.5% as of June 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of TL759.82 Million minus total liabilities of TL261.90 Million yields net assets of TL497.92 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See ERSU total equity for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of ERSU Meyve ve Gida Sanayi AS (2005–2025)
Net asset quality index of ERSU Meyve ve Gida Sanayi AS from 2005 to 2025. This chart shows how ERSU Meyve ve Gida Sanayi AS's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 21 annual periods from 2005 to 2025. As of June 2026, the index stands at 65.5%, representing net assets of TL497.92 Million against total assets of TL759.82 Million TRY. Check ERSU Meyve ve Gida Sanayi AS (ERSU) strategic investment index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
ERSU Meyve ve Gida Sanayi AS Net Asset Quality Index by Year (2005–2025)
ERSU Meyve ve Gida Sanayi AS net asset quality index by year from 2005 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for ERSU Meyve ve Gida Sanayi AS from 2005 to 2025, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see ERSU Meyve ve Gida Sanayi AS stock valuation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (TRY) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 81.2% | TL426.51 Million | TL525.19 Million | TL98.68 Million | ▼ -7.9 pp |
| 2024 | 89.1% | TL549.10 Million | TL616.14 Million | TL67.05 Million | ▲ +11.4 pp |
| 2023 | 77.7% | TL294.49 Million | TL378.88 Million | TL84.39 Million | ▲ +12.9 pp |
| 2022 | 64.8% | TL67.67 Million | TL104.36 Million | TL36.70 Million | ▼ -9.6 pp |
| 2021 | 74.5% | TL68.50 Million | TL91.97 Million | TL23.47 Million | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2020 | 73.7% | TL41.76 Million | TL56.66 Million | TL14.90 Million | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2019 | 70.0% | TL40.88 Million | TL58.37 Million | TL17.49 Million | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2018 | 72.3% | TL37.09 Million | TL51.32 Million | TL14.22 Million | ▼ -7.3 pp |
| 2017 | 79.6% | TL43.68 Million | TL54.86 Million | TL11.18 Million | ▼ -4.7 pp |
| 2016 | 84.3% | TL44.15 Million | TL52.35 Million | TL8.20 Million | ▲ +10.3 pp |
| 2015 | 74.1% | TL45.86 Million | TL61.90 Million | TL16.04 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2014 | 73.7% | TL28.89 Million | TL39.21 Million | TL10.32 Million | ▲ +7.2 pp |
| 2013 | 66.5% | TL29.52 Million | TL44.40 Million | TL14.88 Million | ▼ -13.5 pp |
| 2012 | 80.0% | TL45.90 Million | TL57.36 Million | TL11.46 Million | ▲ +5.1 pp |
| 2011 | 74.9% | TL17.09 Million | TL22.82 Million | TL5.73 Million | ▼ -10.8 pp |
| 2010 | 85.6% | TL20.13 Million | TL23.51 Million | TL3.37 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2009 | 87.3% | TL19.72 Million | TL22.59 Million | TL2.87 Million | ▲ +12.1 pp |
| 2008 | 75.3% | TL20.69 Million | TL27.49 Million | TL6.80 Million | ▼ -18.1 pp |
| 2007 | 93.3% | TL20.85 Million | TL22.34 Million | TL1.49 Million | ▲ +20.1 pp |
| 2006 | 73.2% | TL20.71 Million | TL28.27 Million | TL7.57 Million | ▲ +4.1 pp |
| 2005 | 69.2% | TL23.27 Million | TL33.64 Million | TL10.37 Million | — |