Beam Global (BEEM) — Net Asset Quality Index
Beam Global (BEEM) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 59.5% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $44.60 Million minus total liabilities of $18.08 Million yields net assets of $26.52 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Beam Global defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Beam Global Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2007–2024)
This chart shows how Beam Global's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2007 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 59.5%, representing net assets of $26.52 Million against total assets of $44.60 Million USD. Explore cash flow conversion of Beam Global to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Beam Global (2007–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Beam Global from 2007 to 2024, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Beam Global (BEEM) market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 67.2% | $41.29 Million | $61.46 Million | $20.17 Million | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2023 | 63.8% | $49.54 Million | $77.64 Million | $28.10 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2022 | 61.5% | $23.21 Million | $37.73 Million | $14.52 Million | ▼ -23.2 pp |
| 2021 | 84.7% | $25.98 Million | $30.66 Million | $4.68 Million | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2020 | 88.6% | $29.15 Million | $32.90 Million | $3.75 Million | ▲ +8.7 pp |
| 2019 | 79.9% | $5.82 Million | $7.29 Million | $1.46 Million | ▲ +151.1 pp |
| 2018 | -71.1% | $-2.48 Million | $3.49 Million | $5.97 Million | ▼ -60.4 pp |
| 2017 | -10.8% | $-349.26K | $3.24 Million | $3.59 Million | ▲ +56.5 pp |
| 2016 | -67.3% | $-1.39 Million | $2.06 Million | $3.44 Million | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 2015 | -73.9% | $-1.41 Million | $1.91 Million | $3.31 Million | ▼ -49.4 pp |
| 2014 | -24.5% | $-582.80K | $2.37 Million | $2.96 Million | ▲ +319.9 pp |
| 2013 | -344.4% | $-2.51 Million | $727.56K | $3.23 Million | ▼ -92.2 pp |
| 2012 | -252.2% | $-2.05 Million | $812.10K | $2.86 Million | ▼ -138.1 pp |
| 2011 | -114.1% | $-2.48 Million | $2.18 Million | $4.66 Million | ▲ +916.2 pp |
| 2010 | -1030.3% | $-3.56 Million | $345.32K | $3.90 Million | ▲ +924.3 pp |
| 2009 | -1954.6% | $-20.21K | $1.03K | $21.25K | ▼ -1773.7 pp |
| 2008 | -180.9% | $-1.16 Million | $640.03K | $1.80 Million | ▼ -234.2 pp |
| 2007 | 53.3% | $6.44K | $12.09K | $5.64K | — |