Beam Global Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Beam Global working capital to net assets ratio. Beam Global (BEEM) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 40.9% as of September 2025. Working capital of $10.85 Million (current assets of $21.93 Million minus current liabilities of $11.08 Million) is measured against net assets of $26.52 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check Beam Global tangible equity quality to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Beam Global (2007–2024)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Beam Global from 2007 to 2024. This chart shows how Beam Global's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2007 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 40.9%, reflecting working capital of $10.85 Million against net assets of $26.52 Million USD. See BEEM defensive asset coverage days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Beam Global Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2007–2024)
Beam Global working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2007 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Beam Global from 2007 to 2024, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see BEEM current and non-current assets.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33.5% | $13.81 Million | $41.29 Million | $27.13 Million | $13.31 Million | ▼ -14.7 pp |
| 2023 | 48.1% | $23.85 Million | $49.54 Million | $40.72 Million | $16.87 Million | ▲ +19.0 pp |
| 2022 | 29.1% | $6.76 Million | $23.21 Million | $19.93 Million | $13.17 Million | ▼ -65.6 pp |
| 2021 | 94.7% | $24.61 Million | $25.98 Million | $27.57 Million | $2.96 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2020 | 96.5% | $28.13 Million | $29.15 Million | $29.90 Million | $1.77 Million | ▲ +8.2 pp |
| 2019 | 88.3% | $5.14 Million | $5.82 Million | $6.61 Million | $1.46 Million | ▼ -22.9 pp |
| 2018 | 111.2% | $-2.76 Million | $-2.48 Million | $2.92 Million | $5.68 Million | ▼ -114.0 pp |
| 2017 | 225.2% | $-786.62K | $-349.26K | $2.78 Million | $3.57 Million | ▲ +89.7 pp |
| 2016 | 135.5% | $-1.88 Million | $-1.39 Million | $1.54 Million | $3.41 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2015 | 136.0% | $-1.92 Million | $-1.41 Million | $1.36 Million | $3.28 Million | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2014 | 149.8% | $-873.15K | $-582.80K | $2.08 Million | $2.96 Million | ▲ +45.9 pp |
| 2013 | 103.9% | $-2.60 Million | $-2.51 Million | $629.28K | $3.23 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2012 | 105.2% | $-2.15 Million | $-2.05 Million | $706.42K | $2.86 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2011 | 107.1% | $-2.66 Million | $-2.48 Million | $2.00 Million | $4.66 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2010 | 105.6% | $-3.76 Million | $-3.56 Million | $147.56K | $3.90 Million | ▲ +5.6 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | $-20.21K | $-20.21K | $1.03K | $21.25K | ▼ -33.9 pp |
| 2008 | 133.9% | $-1.55 Million | $-1.16 Million | $247.54K | $1.80 Million | ▲ +33.9 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $6.44K | $6.44K | $12.09K | $5.64K | — |