Beam Global (BEEM) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Beam Global (BEEM) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 40.9% as of September 2025. Working capital of $10.85 Million (current assets of $21.93 Million minus current liabilities of $11.08 Million) is measured against net assets of $26.52 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See Beam Global balance sheet quality to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Beam Global Working Capital to Net Assets (2007–2024)
This chart shows how Beam Global's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2007 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 40.9%, reflecting working capital of $10.85 Million against net assets of $26.52 Million USD. Check Beam Global (BEEM) tangible equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Beam Global (2007–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Beam Global from 2007 to 2024, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see Beam Global stock valuation.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33.5% | $13.81 Million | $41.29 Million | $27.13 Million | $13.31 Million | ▼ -14.7 pp |
| 2023 | 48.1% | $23.85 Million | $49.54 Million | $40.72 Million | $16.87 Million | ▲ +19.0 pp |
| 2022 | 29.1% | $6.76 Million | $23.21 Million | $19.93 Million | $13.17 Million | ▼ -65.6 pp |
| 2021 | 94.7% | $24.61 Million | $25.98 Million | $27.57 Million | $2.96 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2020 | 96.5% | $28.13 Million | $29.15 Million | $29.90 Million | $1.77 Million | ▲ +8.2 pp |
| 2019 | 88.3% | $5.14 Million | $5.82 Million | $6.61 Million | $1.46 Million | ▼ -22.9 pp |
| 2018 | 111.2% | $-2.76 Million | $-2.48 Million | $2.92 Million | $5.68 Million | ▼ -114.0 pp |
| 2017 | 225.2% | $-786.62K | $-349.26K | $2.78 Million | $3.57 Million | ▲ +89.7 pp |
| 2016 | 135.5% | $-1.88 Million | $-1.39 Million | $1.54 Million | $3.41 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2015 | 136.0% | $-1.92 Million | $-1.41 Million | $1.36 Million | $3.28 Million | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2014 | 149.8% | $-873.15K | $-582.80K | $2.08 Million | $2.96 Million | ▲ +45.9 pp |
| 2013 | 103.9% | $-2.60 Million | $-2.51 Million | $629.28K | $3.23 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2012 | 105.2% | $-2.15 Million | $-2.05 Million | $706.42K | $2.86 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2011 | 107.1% | $-2.66 Million | $-2.48 Million | $2.00 Million | $4.66 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2010 | 105.6% | $-3.76 Million | $-3.56 Million | $147.56K | $3.90 Million | ▲ +5.6 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | $-20.21K | $-20.21K | $1.03K | $21.25K | ▼ -33.9 pp |
| 2008 | 133.9% | $-1.55 Million | $-1.16 Million | $247.54K | $1.80 Million | ▲ +33.9 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $6.44K | $6.44K | $12.09K | $5.64K | — |