Bimi International Medical Inc Net Asset Quality Index
Bimi International Medical Inc net asset quality index. Bimi International Medical Inc (BIMI) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 28.9% as of September 2023. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $35.04 Million minus total liabilities of $24.90 Million yields net assets of $10.14 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check how high is Bimi International Medical Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Bimi International Medical Inc (2002–2022)
Net asset quality index of Bimi International Medical Inc from 2002 to 2022. This chart shows how Bimi International Medical Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 21 annual periods from 2002 to 2022. As of September 2023, the index stands at 28.9%, representing net assets of $10.14 Million against total assets of $35.04 Million USD. See shareholders equity of Bimi International Medical Inc for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Bimi International Medical Inc Net Asset Quality Index by Year (2002–2022)
Bimi International Medical Inc net asset quality index by year from 2002 to 2022. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Bimi International Medical Inc from 2002 to 2022, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see BIMI company net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 14.6% | $5.22 Million | $35.71 Million | $30.50 Million | ▼ -15.1 pp |
| 2021 | 29.7% | $11.34 Million | $38.13 Million | $26.79 Million | ▼ -21.1 pp |
| 2020 | 50.9% | $16.89 Million | $33.20 Million | $16.31 Million | ▲ +22.6 pp |
| 2019 | 28.3% | $8.51 Million | $30.06 Million | $21.55 Million | ▼ -15.0 pp |
| 2018 | 43.3% | $9.99 Million | $23.05 Million | $13.07 Million | ▼ -22.6 pp |
| 2017 | 65.9% | $27.30 Million | $41.43 Million | $14.14 Million | ▼ -5.7 pp |
| 2016 | 71.6% | $26.71 Million | $37.32 Million | $10.61 Million | ▲ +3.1 pp |
| 2015 | 68.5% | $30.38 Million | $44.35 Million | $13.98 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2014 | 64.9% | $31.33 Million | $48.30 Million | $16.97 Million | ▼ -9.8 pp |
| 2013 | 74.7% | $31.86 Million | $42.68 Million | $10.81 Million | ▲ +5.1 pp |
| 2012 | 69.6% | $29.81 Million | $42.83 Million | $13.02 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2011 | 67.4% | $29.52 Million | $43.82 Million | $14.30 Million | ▼ -9.8 pp |
| 2010 | 77.1% | $26.26 Million | $34.03 Million | $7.78 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2009 | 79.1% | $20.62 Million | $26.07 Million | $5.45 Million | ▼ -7.0 pp |
| 2008 | 86.1% | $15.55 Million | $18.05 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2007 | 84.3% | $9.16 Million | $10.87 Million | $1.71 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2006 | 80.7% | $5.23 Million | $6.48 Million | $1.25 Million | ▲ +24793.4 pp |
| 2005 | -24712.8% | $-637.59K | $2.58K | $640.17K | ▼ -24404.0 pp |
| 2004 | -308.8% | $-409.66K | $132.67K | $542.33K | ▲ +115.8 pp |
| 2003 | -424.5% | $-255.23K | $60.12K | $315.35K | ▲ +6379.7 pp |
| 2002 | -6804.2% | $-178.41K | $2.62K | $181.03K | — |