Bimi International Medical Inc (BIMI) — Net Asset Quality Index
Bimi International Medical Inc (BIMI) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 28.9% as of September 2023. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $35.04 Million minus total liabilities of $24.90 Million yields net assets of $10.14 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Also explore Bimi International Medical Inc balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Bimi International Medical Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2002–2022)
This chart shows how Bimi International Medical Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 21 annual periods from 2002 to 2022. As of September 2023, the index stands at 28.9%, representing net assets of $10.14 Million against total assets of $35.04 Million USD. See BIMI working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Bimi International Medical Inc (2002–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Bimi International Medical Inc from 2002 to 2022, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see market value of Bimi International Medical Inc.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 14.6% | $5.22 Million | $35.71 Million | $30.50 Million | ▼ -15.1 pp |
| 2021 | 29.7% | $11.34 Million | $38.13 Million | $26.79 Million | ▼ -21.1 pp |
| 2020 | 50.9% | $16.89 Million | $33.20 Million | $16.31 Million | ▲ +22.6 pp |
| 2019 | 28.3% | $8.51 Million | $30.06 Million | $21.55 Million | ▼ -15.0 pp |
| 2018 | 43.3% | $9.99 Million | $23.05 Million | $13.07 Million | ▼ -22.6 pp |
| 2017 | 65.9% | $27.30 Million | $41.43 Million | $14.14 Million | ▼ -5.7 pp |
| 2016 | 71.6% | $26.71 Million | $37.32 Million | $10.61 Million | ▲ +3.1 pp |
| 2015 | 68.5% | $30.38 Million | $44.35 Million | $13.98 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2014 | 64.9% | $31.33 Million | $48.30 Million | $16.97 Million | ▼ -9.8 pp |
| 2013 | 74.7% | $31.86 Million | $42.68 Million | $10.81 Million | ▲ +5.1 pp |
| 2012 | 69.6% | $29.81 Million | $42.83 Million | $13.02 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2011 | 67.4% | $29.52 Million | $43.82 Million | $14.30 Million | ▼ -9.8 pp |
| 2010 | 77.1% | $26.26 Million | $34.03 Million | $7.78 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2009 | 79.1% | $20.62 Million | $26.07 Million | $5.45 Million | ▼ -7.0 pp |
| 2008 | 86.1% | $15.55 Million | $18.05 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2007 | 84.3% | $9.16 Million | $10.87 Million | $1.71 Million | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2006 | 80.7% | $5.23 Million | $6.48 Million | $1.25 Million | ▲ +24793.4 pp |
| 2005 | -24712.8% | $-637.59K | $2.58K | $640.17K | ▼ -24404.0 pp |
| 2004 | -308.8% | $-409.66K | $132.67K | $542.33K | ▲ +115.8 pp |
| 2003 | -424.5% | $-255.23K | $60.12K | $315.35K | ▲ +6379.7 pp |
| 2002 | -6804.2% | $-178.41K | $2.62K | $181.03K | — |