Bimi International Medical Inc (BIMI) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Bimi International Medical Inc (BIMI) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 41.5% as of September 2023. Working capital of $4.21 Million (current assets of $24.37 Million minus current liabilities of $20.16 Million) is measured against net assets of $10.14 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See Bimi International Medical Inc free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Bimi International Medical Inc Working Capital to Net Assets (2002–2022)
This chart shows how Bimi International Medical Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 21 annual periods from 2002 to 2022. As of September 2023, the ratio stands at 41.5%, reflecting working capital of $4.21 Million against net assets of $10.14 Million USD. See BIMI days of operational coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Bimi International Medical Inc (2002–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Bimi International Medical Inc from 2002 to 2022, covering 21 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see Bimi International Medical Inc stock valuation.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -40.8% | $-2.13 Million | $5.22 Million | $23.24 Million | $25.36 Million | ▼ -32.5 pp |
| 2021 | -8.2% | $-932.49K | $11.34 Million | $21.16 Million | $22.09 Million | ▼ -65.2 pp |
| 2020 | 56.9% | $9.62 Million | $16.89 Million | $25.18 Million | $15.57 Million | ▲ +51.1 pp |
| 2019 | 5.9% | $500.76K | $8.51 Million | $22.05 Million | $21.55 Million | ▲ +110.6 pp |
| 2018 | -104.7% | $-10.46 Million | $9.99 Million | $2.61 Million | $13.07 Million | ▼ -121.7 pp |
| 2017 | 16.9% | $4.62 Million | $27.30 Million | $18.76 Million | $14.14 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2016 | 16.9% | $4.50 Million | $26.71 Million | $15.11 Million | $10.61 Million | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2015 | 18.4% | $5.60 Million | $30.38 Million | $19.58 Million | $13.98 Million | ▲ +12.5 pp |
| 2014 | 6.0% | $1.87 Million | $31.33 Million | $18.84 Million | $16.97 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2013 | 5.3% | $1.68 Million | $31.86 Million | $12.49 Million | $10.81 Million | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2012 | 2.3% | $674.73K | $29.81 Million | $13.69 Million | $13.02 Million | ▼ -11.3 pp |
| 2011 | 13.6% | $4.02 Million | $29.52 Million | $17.36 Million | $13.34 Million | ▼ -30.0 pp |
| 2010 | 43.7% | $11.46 Million | $26.26 Million | $18.31 Million | $6.85 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2009 | 48.9% | $10.08 Million | $20.62 Million | $14.86 Million | $4.78 Million | ▼ -20.7 pp |
| 2008 | 69.6% | $10.83 Million | $15.55 Million | $13.33 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 2007 | 72.6% | $6.65 Million | $9.16 Million | $8.36 Million | $1.71 Million | ▲ +14.6 pp |
| 2006 | 58.0% | $3.03 Million | $5.23 Million | $4.28 Million | $1.25 Million | ▼ -42.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | $-637.59K | $-637.59K | $2.58K | $640.17K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | $-409.66K | $-409.66K | $132.67K | $542.33K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $-255.23K | $-255.23K | $60.12K | $315.35K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $-178.41K | $-178.41K | $2.62K | $181.03K | — |