Blink Charging Co (BLNK) — Net Asset Quality Index
Blink Charging Co (BLNK) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 43.7% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $147.45 Million minus total liabilities of $82.96 Million yields net assets of $64.49 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read BLNK total liabilities for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Blink Charging Co Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2007–2025)
This chart shows how Blink Charging Co's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2007 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 43.7%, representing net assets of $64.49 Million against total assets of $147.45 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Blink Charging Co (BLNK) market capitalisation.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Blink Charging Co (2007–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Blink Charging Co from 2007 to 2025, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check Blink Charging Co (BLNK) strategic asset index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 43.7% | $64.49 Million | $147.45 Million | $82.96 Million | ▼ -10.7 pp |
| 2024 | 54.5% | $118.70 Million | $217.99 Million | $99.29 Million | ▼ -13.1 pp |
| 2023 | 67.5% | $289.40 Million | $428.52 Million | $139.12 Million | ▼ -4.4 pp |
| 2022 | 72.0% | $260.96 Million | $362.54 Million | $101.58 Million | ▼ -20.2 pp |
| 2021 | 92.2% | $213.83 Million | $231.91 Million | $18.08 Million | ▲ +12.3 pp |
| 2020 | 79.9% | $27.16 Million | $33.99 Million | $6.82 Million | ▲ +17.7 pp |
| 2019 | 62.2% | $7.43 Million | $11.95 Million | $4.51 Million | ▼ -12.1 pp |
| 2018 | 74.3% | $16.09 Million | $21.65 Million | $5.56 Million | ▲ +1448.3 pp |
| 2017 | -1374.0% | $-36.92 Million | $2.69 Million | $39.61 Million | ▼ -284.9 pp |
| 2016 | -1089.1% | $-20.81 Million | $1.91 Million | $22.72 Million | ▼ -848.1 pp |
| 2015 | -241.0% | $-14.86 Million | $6.16 Million | $21.02 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | -241.0% | $-14.86 Million | $6.16 Million | $21.02 Million | ▼ -239.2 pp |
| 2013 | -1.8% | $-423.25K | $23.47 Million | $23.89 Million | ▼ -62.0 pp |
| 2012 | 60.2% | $1.23 Million | $2.04 Million | $812.25K | ▼ -11.9 pp |
| 2011 | 72.1% | $954.66K | $1.32 Million | $368.90K | ▲ +446.5 pp |
| 2010 | -374.4% | $-2.88 Million | $769.18K | $3.65 Million | ▲ +418.7 pp |
| 2009 | -793.1% | $-6.54 Million | $825.07K | $7.37 Million | ▼ -840.1 pp |
| 2008 | 47.0% | $10.70K | $22.77K | $12.07K | ▼ -21.4 pp |
| 2007 | 68.4% | $18.65K | $27.27K | $8.62K | — |