Duos Technologies Group Inc (DUOT) — Net Asset Quality Index
Duos Technologies Group Inc (DUOT) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 70.9% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $69.79 Million minus total liabilities of $20.29 Million yields net assets of $49.50 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read Duos Technologies Group Inc total liabilities for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Duos Technologies Group Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2007–2024)
This chart shows how Duos Technologies Group Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2007 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 70.9%, representing net assets of $49.50 Million against total assets of $69.79 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see DUOT company net worth.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Duos Technologies Group Inc (2007–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Duos Technologies Group Inc from 2007 to 2024, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check DUOT strategic asset allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6.5% | $2.26 Million | $34.96 Million | $32.70 Million | ▼ -35.3 pp |
| 2023 | 41.8% | $5.37 Million | $12.84 Million | $7.48 Million | ▲ +10.8 pp |
| 2022 | 30.9% | $4.05 Million | $13.09 Million | $9.04 Million | ▲ +22.7 pp |
| 2021 | 8.2% | $781.49K | $9.48 Million | $8.70 Million | ▼ -21.2 pp |
| 2020 | 29.4% | $1.88 Million | $6.41 Million | $4.52 Million | ▲ +31.7 pp |
| 2019 | -2.3% | $-127.27K | $5.53 Million | $5.66 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2018 | -3.8% | $-170.99K | $4.49 Million | $4.66 Million | ▼ -25.5 pp |
| 2017 | 21.7% | $622.53K | $2.87 Million | $2.24 Million | ▲ +21.7 pp |
| 2016 | 0.0% | $0.00 | $1.16 Million | $1.16 Million | ▲ +287.3 pp |
| 2015 | -287.3% | $-3.76 Million | $1.31 Million | $5.07 Million | ▲ +2074.6 pp |
| 2014 | -2361.9% | $-1.05 Million | $44.38K | $1.09 Million | ▼ -1047.3 pp |
| 2013 | -1314.7% | $-932.55K | $70.94K | $1.00 Million | ▼ -138.0 pp |
| 2012 | -1176.6% | $-754.73K | $64.14K | $818.87K | ▼ -1061.8 pp |
| 2011 | -114.8% | $-317.72K | $276.66K | $594.38K | ▼ -177.0 pp |
| 2010 | 62.1% | $186.20K | $299.71K | $113.51K | ▼ -14.7 pp |
| 2009 | 76.8% | $375.58K | $488.89K | $113.32K | ▼ -19.1 pp |
| 2008 | 96.0% | $804.67K | $838.50K | $33.83K | ▲ +28.8 pp |
| 2007 | 67.1% | $205.78K | $306.45K | $100.67K | — |