Duos Technologies Group Inc (DUOT) — Net Asset Quality Index
Duos Technologies Group Inc (DUOT) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 70.9% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $69.79 Million minus total liabilities of $20.29 Million yields net assets of $49.50 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See how many days can Duos Technologies Group Inc fund operations to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Duos Technologies Group Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2007–2024)
This chart shows how Duos Technologies Group Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2007 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 70.9%, representing net assets of $49.50 Million against total assets of $69.79 Million USD. Explore DUOT operating cash flow to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Duos Technologies Group Inc (2007–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Duos Technologies Group Inc from 2007 to 2024, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Duos Technologies Group Inc (DUOT) market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6.5% | $2.26 Million | $34.96 Million | $32.70 Million | ▼ -35.3 pp |
| 2023 | 41.8% | $5.37 Million | $12.84 Million | $7.48 Million | ▲ +10.8 pp |
| 2022 | 30.9% | $4.05 Million | $13.09 Million | $9.04 Million | ▲ +22.7 pp |
| 2021 | 8.2% | $781.49K | $9.48 Million | $8.70 Million | ▼ -21.2 pp |
| 2020 | 29.4% | $1.88 Million | $6.41 Million | $4.52 Million | ▲ +31.7 pp |
| 2019 | -2.3% | $-127.27K | $5.53 Million | $5.66 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2018 | -3.8% | $-170.99K | $4.49 Million | $4.66 Million | ▼ -25.5 pp |
| 2017 | 21.7% | $622.53K | $2.87 Million | $2.24 Million | ▲ +21.7 pp |
| 2016 | 0.0% | $0.00 | $1.16 Million | $1.16 Million | ▲ +287.3 pp |
| 2015 | -287.3% | $-3.76 Million | $1.31 Million | $5.07 Million | ▲ +2074.6 pp |
| 2014 | -2361.9% | $-1.05 Million | $44.38K | $1.09 Million | ▼ -1047.3 pp |
| 2013 | -1314.7% | $-932.55K | $70.94K | $1.00 Million | ▼ -138.0 pp |
| 2012 | -1176.6% | $-754.73K | $64.14K | $818.87K | ▼ -1061.8 pp |
| 2011 | -114.8% | $-317.72K | $276.66K | $594.38K | ▼ -177.0 pp |
| 2010 | 62.1% | $186.20K | $299.71K | $113.51K | ▼ -14.7 pp |
| 2009 | 76.8% | $375.58K | $488.89K | $113.32K | ▼ -19.1 pp |
| 2008 | 96.0% | $804.67K | $838.50K | $33.83K | ▲ +28.8 pp |
| 2007 | 67.1% | $205.78K | $306.45K | $100.67K | — |