Duos Technologies Group Inc (DUOT) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Duos Technologies Group Inc (DUOT) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 55.7% as of September 2025. Working capital of $27.57 Million (current assets of $37.24 Million minus current liabilities of $9.67 Million) is measured against net assets of $49.50 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See DUOT equity to assets ratio to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Duos Technologies Group Inc Working Capital to Net Assets (2007–2024)
This chart shows how Duos Technologies Group Inc's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 17 annual periods from 2007 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 55.7%, reflecting working capital of $27.57 Million against net assets of $49.50 Million USD. Check DUOT goodwill-adjusted equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Duos Technologies Group Inc (2007–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Duos Technologies Group Inc from 2007 to 2024, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company profile, see DUOT market cap.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -353.9% | $-8.00 Million | $2.26 Million | $8.09 Million | $16.09 Million | ▼ -410.0 pp |
| 2023 | 56.1% | $3.01 Million | $5.37 Million | $6.26 Million | $3.25 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2022 | 57.7% | $2.34 Million | $4.05 Million | $6.83 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +141.1 pp |
| 2021 | -83.4% | $-651.38K | $781.49K | $3.29 Million | $3.94 Million | ▼ -198.4 pp |
| 2020 | 115.0% | $2.17 Million | $1.88 Million | $5.80 Million | $3.64 Million | ▼ -362.2 pp |
| 2019 | 477.2% | $-607.37K | $-127.27K | $4.76 Million | $5.37 Million | ▲ +202.9 pp |
| 2018 | 274.3% | $-469.08K | $-170.99K | $4.19 Million | $4.66 Million | ▲ +185.9 pp |
| 2017 | 88.4% | $550.33K | $622.53K | $2.75 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -15.0 pp |
| 2015 | 103.4% | $-3.89 Million | $-3.76 Million | $1.18 Million | $5.07 Million | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2014 | 100.2% | $-1.05 Million | $-1.05 Million | $42.77K | $1.09 Million | ▼ -1.4 pp |
| 2013 | 101.5% | $-946.83K | $-932.55K | $56.65K | $1.00 Million | ▲ +17.5 pp |
| 2012 | 84.0% | $-633.86K | $-754.73K | $41.15K | $675.00K | ▼ -32.5 pp |
| 2011 | 116.5% | $-370.22K | $-317.72K | $224.16K | $594.38K | ▲ +27.1 pp |
| 2010 | 89.4% | $166.52K | $186.20K | $280.03K | $113.51K | ▲ +52.0 pp |
| 2009 | 37.5% | $140.73K | $375.58K | $254.04K | $113.32K | ▼ -59.9 pp |
| 2008 | 97.4% | $783.50K | $804.67K | $817.33K | $33.83K | ▲ +65.1 pp |
| 2007 | 32.3% | $66.42K | $205.78K | $167.09K | $100.67K | — |