Evotec SE ADR (EVO) — Net Asset Quality Index
Evotec SE ADR (EVO) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 42.7% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $1.64 Billion minus total liabilities of $941.17 Million yields net assets of $700.35 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read debt load of Evotec SE ADR for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Evotec SE ADR Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2003–2025)
This chart shows how Evotec SE ADR's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 23 annual periods from 2003 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 42.7%, representing net assets of $700.35 Million against total assets of $1.64 Billion USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market cap of Evotec SE ADR.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Evotec SE ADR (2003–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Evotec SE ADR from 2003 to 2025, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check Evotec SE ADR strategic asset allocation index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 45.7% | $813.36 Million | $1.78 Billion | $964.64 Million | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2024 | 49.8% | $952.52 Million | $1.91 Billion | $959.98 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2023 | 48.7% | $1.12 Billion | $2.30 Billion | $1.18 Billion | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2022 | 52.6% | $1.19 Billion | $2.26 Billion | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -9.0 pp |
| 2021 | 61.6% | $1.38 Billion | $2.24 Billion | $857.48 Million | ▲ +13.4 pp |
| 2020 | 48.2% | $886.41 Million | $1.84 Billion | $951.26 Million | ▲ +9.4 pp |
| 2019 | 38.8% | $535.47 Million | $1.38 Billion | $844.39 Million | ▼ -16.2 pp |
| 2018 | 55.0% | $424.88 Million | $771.88 Million | $347.00 Million | ▲ +5.3 pp |
| 2017 | 49.7% | $331.75 Million | $667.27 Million | $335.52 Million | ▼ -11.2 pp |
| 2016 | 60.9% | $213.94 Million | $351.37 Million | $137.43 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2015 | 64.8% | $187.09 Million | $288.54 Million | $101.44 Million | ▼ -5.7 pp |
| 2014 | 70.5% | $158.38 Million | $224.60 Million | $66.22 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2013 | 69.9% | $158.97 Million | $227.38 Million | $68.41 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2012 | 67.7% | $152.55 Million | $225.43 Million | $72.88 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2011 | 67.5% | $147.25 Million | $218.21 Million | $70.97 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2010 | 69.1% | $132.64 Million | $191.86 Million | $59.22 Million | ▼ -6.9 pp |
| 2009 | 76.0% | $111.49 Million | $146.60 Million | $35.11 Million | ▼ -5.9 pp |
| 2008 | 81.9% | $149.86 Million | $182.90 Million | $33.04 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 82.0% | $170.55 Million | $207.88 Million | $37.33 Million | ▲ +15.3 pp |
| 2006 | 66.7% | $137.18 Million | $205.53 Million | $68.35 Million | ▼ -13.1 pp |
| 2005 | 79.9% | $148.67 Million | $186.11 Million | $37.44 Million | ▼ -7.2 pp |
| 2004 | 87.1% | $61.73 Million | $70.91 Million | $9.18 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2003 | 86.3% | $36.03 Million | $41.73 Million | $5.70 Million | — |