Great Elm Capital Corp (GECC) — Net Asset Quality Index
Great Elm Capital Corp (GECC) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 33.4% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $420.05 Million minus total liabilities of $279.95 Million yields net assets of $140.10 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Great Elm Capital Corp asset resilience ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Great Elm Capital Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2010–2024)
This chart shows how Great Elm Capital Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 16 annual periods from 2010 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 33.4%, representing net assets of $140.10 Million against total assets of $420.05 Million USD. See GECC net working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Great Elm Capital Corp (2010–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Great Elm Capital Corp from 2010 to 2024, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Great Elm Capital Corp (GECC) market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39.8% | $136.11 Million | $342.03 Million | $205.91 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2023 | 40.0% | $98.74 Million | $246.82 Million | $148.09 Million | ▲ +12.7 pp |
| 2022 | 27.3% | $84.81 Million | $310.11 Million | $225.30 Million | ▲ +9.9 pp |
| 2021 | 17.5% | $74.56 Million | $426.31 Million | $351.76 Million | ▼ -10.6 pp |
| 2020 | 28.1% | $79.61 Million | $283.33 Million | $203.71 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2019 | 29.9% | $86.89 Million | $291.04 Million | $204.15 Million | ▼ -9.3 pp |
| 2018 | 39.1% | $110.12 Million | $281.56 Million | $171.45 Million | ▼ -16.0 pp |
| 2017 | 55.1% | $132.29 Million | $239.91 Million | $107.63 Million | ▼ -31.2 pp |
| 2017 | 86.4% | $66.23 Million | $76.69 Million | $10.47 Million | ▲ +13.2 pp |
| 2016 | 73.1% | $172.98 Million | $236.54 Million | $63.56 Million | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2015 | 69.6% | $80.67 Million | $115.86 Million | $35.19 Million | ▲ +7.4 pp |
| 2014 | 62.2% | $99.94 Million | $160.72 Million | $60.79 Million | ▲ +15.2 pp |
| 2013 | 47.0% | $72.98 Million | $155.34 Million | $82.36 Million | ▼ -6.7 pp |
| 2012 | 53.6% | $60.64 Million | $113.06 Million | $52.42 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2011 | 53.7% | $53.44 Million | $99.45 Million | $46.01 Million | ▼ -10.1 pp |
| 2010 | 63.8% | $56.47 Million | $88.50 Million | $32.02 Million | — |