DeepMarkit Corp. (MKTSF) — Net Asset Quality Index
DeepMarkit Corp. (MKTSF) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -982.8% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $71.89K minus total liabilities of $778.36K yields net assets of $-706.47K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check DeepMarkit Corp. (MKTSF) liquid assets ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
DeepMarkit Corp. Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2010–2025)
This chart shows how DeepMarkit Corp.'s Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 16 annual periods from 2010 to 2025. As of September 2025, the index stands at -982.8%, representing net assets of $-706.47K against total assets of $71.89K USD. See DeepMarkit Corp. current assets vs equity to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for DeepMarkit Corp. (2010–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for DeepMarkit Corp. from 2010 to 2025, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see market value of DeepMarkit Corp..
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -350.1% | $-590.20K | $168.59K | $758.78K | ▼ -192.1 pp |
| 2024 | -158.0% | $-409.40K | $259.06K | $668.46K | ▲ +71.1 pp |
| 2023 | -229.2% | $-362.40K | $158.13K | $520.53K | ▼ -271.8 pp |
| 2022 | 42.7% | $276.44K | $648.00K | $371.56K | ▲ +2394.1 pp |
| 2021 | -2351.5% | $-2.61 Million | $110.82K | $2.72 Million | ▼ -1790.5 pp |
| 2020 | -561.0% | $-2.05 Million | $364.81K | $2.41 Million | ▼ -168.8 pp |
| 2019 | -392.2% | $-1.73 Million | $440.45K | $2.17 Million | ▼ -144.7 pp |
| 2018 | -247.5% | $-1.51 Million | $609.11K | $2.12 Million | ▲ +181.3 pp |
| 2017 | -428.8% | $-1.69 Million | $393.94K | $2.08 Million | ▼ -498.0 pp |
| 2016 | 69.1% | $206.63K | $298.84K | $92.21K | ▼ -25.9 pp |
| 2015 | 95.0% | $898.67K | $946.01K | $47.34K | ▲ +4.2 pp |
| 2014 | 90.8% | $959.11K | $1.06 Million | $97.40K | ▼ -4.2 pp |
| 2013 | 95.0% | $2.34 Million | $2.46 Million | $122.61K | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2012 | 95.6% | $3.19 Million | $3.34 Million | $145.37K | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2011 | 95.4% | $1.54 Million | $1.61 Million | $74.27K | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2010 | 97.1% | $759.78K | $782.43K | $22.65K | — |