DeepMarkit Corp. Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
DeepMarkit Corp. working capital to net assets ratio. DeepMarkit Corp. (MKTSF) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 93.0% as of September 2025. Working capital of $-656.88K (current assets of $70.86K minus current liabilities of $727.75K) is measured against net assets of $-706.47K. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check DeepMarkit Corp. (MKTSF) tangible net worth to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of DeepMarkit Corp. (2010–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of DeepMarkit Corp. from 2010 to 2025. This chart shows how DeepMarkit Corp.'s Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 16 annual periods from 2010 to 2025. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 93.0%, reflecting working capital of $-656.88K against net assets of $-706.47K USD. See DeepMarkit Corp. (MKTSF) liquidity interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
DeepMarkit Corp. Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2010–2025)
DeepMarkit Corp. working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2010 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for DeepMarkit Corp. from 2010 to 2025, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see DeepMarkit Corp. (MKTSF) total assets.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 91.9% | $-542.10K | $-590.20K | $167.48K | $709.58K | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2024 | 89.8% | $-367.69K | $-409.40K | $257.49K | $625.18K | ▼ -10.8 pp |
| 2023 | 100.6% | $-364.65K | $-362.40K | $155.88K | $520.53K | ▲ +14.6 pp |
| 2022 | 86.0% | $237.73K | $276.44K | $609.29K | $371.56K | ▼ -14.3 pp |
| 2021 | 100.3% | $-2.61 Million | $-2.61 Million | $102.40K | $2.72 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2020 | 100.6% | $-2.06 Million | $-2.05 Million | $352.48K | $2.41 Million | ▲ +115.0 pp |
| 2019 | -14.4% | $248.69K | $-1.73 Million | $423.14K | $174.45K | ▲ +18.3 pp |
| 2018 | -32.7% | $493.50K | $-1.51 Million | $580.94K | $87.45K | ▼ -15.6 pp |
| 2017 | -17.2% | $289.92K | $-1.69 Million | $358.50K | $68.59K | ▼ -104.6 pp |
| 2016 | 87.4% | $180.66K | $206.63K | $272.88K | $92.21K | ▼ -12.6 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | $898.67K | $898.67K | $946.01K | $47.34K | ▲ +79.6 pp |
| 2014 | 20.4% | $195.78K | $959.11K | $293.19K | $97.40K | ▼ -6.7 pp |
| 2013 | 27.1% | $635.43K | $2.34 Million | $758.03K | $122.61K | ▼ -27.4 pp |
| 2012 | 54.5% | $1.74 Million | $3.19 Million | $1.89 Million | $145.37K | ▼ -32.6 pp |
| 2011 | 87.1% | $1.34 Million | $1.54 Million | $1.41 Million | $74.27K | ▲ +9.1 pp |
| 2010 | 78.0% | $592.61K | $759.78K | $615.25K | $22.65K | — |