MediciNova Inc (MNOV) — Net Asset Quality Index
MediciNova Inc (MNOV) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 92.4% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $47.58 Million minus total liabilities of $3.61 Million yields net assets of $43.96 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check MNOV asset liquidity ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
MediciNova Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2001–2024)
This chart shows how MediciNova Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 24 annual periods from 2001 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 92.4%, representing net assets of $43.96 Million against total assets of $47.58 Million USD. See how liquid is MediciNova Inc's working capital to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for MediciNova Inc (2001–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for MediciNova Inc from 2001 to 2024, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see market value of MediciNova Inc.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 94.0% | $52.50 Million | $55.88 Million | $3.37 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2023 | 94.1% | $62.38 Million | $66.27 Million | $3.89 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2022 | 94.7% | $70.24 Million | $74.15 Million | $3.91 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2021 | 95.7% | $83.68 Million | $87.41 Million | $3.73 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2020 | 94.6% | $71.33 Million | $75.42 Million | $4.09 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 94.6% | $74.89 Million | $79.21 Million | $4.31 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 94.7% | $73.11 Million | $77.22 Million | $4.12 Million | ▲ +5.7 pp |
| 2017 | 89.0% | $38.64 Million | $43.42 Million | $4.78 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2016 | 86.7% | $34.53 Million | $39.81 Million | $5.28 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2015 | 86.4% | $32.75 Million | $37.91 Million | $5.15 Million | ▲ +5.7 pp |
| 2014 | 80.7% | $22.01 Million | $27.27 Million | $5.26 Million | ▼ -5.4 pp |
| 2013 | 86.1% | $25.43 Million | $29.55 Million | $4.12 Million | ▲ +10.0 pp |
| 2012 | 76.0% | $14.88 Million | $19.57 Million | $4.69 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2011 | 76.3% | $23.50 Million | $30.79 Million | $7.29 Million | ▲ +42.4 pp |
| 2010 | 33.9% | $24.70 Million | $72.93 Million | $48.23 Million | ▼ -8.5 pp |
| 2009 | 42.4% | $40.01 Million | $94.33 Million | $54.31 Million | ▼ -53.2 pp |
| 2008 | 95.7% | $48.04 Million | $50.22 Million | $2.18 Million | ▲ +5.3 pp |
| 2007 | 90.3% | $66.61 Million | $73.75 Million | $7.14 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2006 | 90.5% | $100.98 Million | $111.59 Million | $10.61 Million | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2005 | 95.3% | $135.71 Million | $142.39 Million | $6.69 Million | ▲ +81.0 pp |
| 2004 | 14.3% | $7.67 Million | $53.77 Million | $46.10 Million | ▼ -66.9 pp |
| 2003 | 81.2% | $4.57 Million | $5.63 Million | $1.06 Million | ▲ +10.4 pp |
| 2002 | 70.7% | $1.12 Million | $1.59 Million | $464.00K | ▼ -25.4 pp |
| 2001 | 96.1% | $8.05 Million | $8.38 Million | $325.00K | — |