Marker Therapeutics Inc (MRKR) — Net Asset Quality Index
Marker Therapeutics Inc (MRKR) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 79.1% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $17.43 Million minus total liabilities of $3.64 Million yields net assets of $13.80 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read Marker Therapeutics Inc balance sheet liabilities for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Marker Therapeutics Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1999–2025)
This chart shows how Marker Therapeutics Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 26 annual periods from 1999 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 79.1%, representing net assets of $13.80 Million against total assets of $17.43 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market cap of Marker Therapeutics Inc.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Marker Therapeutics Inc (1999–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Marker Therapeutics Inc from 1999 to 2025, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check MRKR PP&E to net assets ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 88.1% | $16.80 Million | $19.07 Million | $2.27 Million | ▲ +3.8 pp |
| 2024 | 84.3% | $18.56 Million | $22.02 Million | $3.46 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2023 | 82.0% | $14.05 Million | $17.13 Million | $3.07 Million | ▲ +25.1 pp |
| 2022 | 56.9% | $19.60 Million | $34.42 Million | $14.82 Million | ▼ -7.6 pp |
| 2021 | 64.6% | $43.99 Million | $68.14 Million | $24.15 Million | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2020 | 59.9% | $27.34 Million | $45.61 Million | $18.27 Million | ▼ -35.2 pp |
| 2019 | 95.1% | $44.09 Million | $46.36 Million | $2.27 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2018 | 95.5% | $59.34 Million | $62.14 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +24.9 pp |
| 2017 | 70.6% | $3.66 Million | $5.18 Million | $1.52 Million | ▼ -7.5 pp |
| 2016 | 78.1% | $6.18 Million | $7.92 Million | $1.74 Million | ▲ +399.5 pp |
| 2015 | -321.4% | $-21.36 Million | $6.65 Million | $28.01 Million | ▲ +134.6 pp |
| 2014 | -456.1% | $-1.02 Million | $224.45K | $1.25 Million | ▲ +10926.2 pp |
| 2013 | -11382.3% | $-8.77 Million | $77.03K | $8.85 Million | ▼ -5944.7 pp |
| 2012 | -5437.6% | $-5.67 Million | $104.21K | $5.77 Million | ▼ -4420.4 pp |
| 2011 | -1017.1% | $-3.46 Million | $340.21K | $3.80 Million | ▲ +1793.5 pp |
| 2010 | -2810.6% | $-3.27 Million | $116.43K | $3.39 Million | ▼ -2634.3 pp |
| 2009 | -176.3% | $-629.39K | $356.96K | $986.35K | ▲ +5538.0 pp |
| 2008 | -5714.3% | $-3.02 Million | $52.91K | $3.08 Million | ▼ -5114.2 pp |
| 2007 | -600.0% | $-1.67 Million | $279.11K | $1.95 Million | ▲ +1343.8 pp |
| 2006 | -1943.9% | $-3.00 Million | $154.34K | $3.15 Million | ▲ +526.4 pp |
| 2005 | -2470.3% | $-2.22 Million | $89.86K | $2.31 Million | ▲ +296.8 pp |
| 2004 | -2767.0% | $-2.44 Million | $88.19K | $2.53 Million | ▼ -2076.4 pp |
| 2003 | -690.7% | $-643.75K | $93.21K | $736.95K | ▼ -751.8 pp |
| 2002 | 61.2% | $465.83K | $761.43K | $295.60K | ▲ +526.4 pp |
| 2000 | -465.2% | $-561.95K | $120.79K | $682.74K | ▼ -369.9 pp |
| 1999 | -95.4% | $-141.42K | $148.28K | $289.71K | — |