Marker Therapeutics Inc (MRKR) — Net Asset Quality Index
Marker Therapeutics Inc (MRKR) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 84.6% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $21.73 Million minus total liabilities of $3.35 Million yields net assets of $18.39 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Also explore MRKR total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Marker Therapeutics Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1999–2024)
This chart shows how Marker Therapeutics Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 25 annual periods from 1999 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 84.6%, representing net assets of $18.39 Million against total assets of $21.73 Million USD. See MRKR net working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Marker Therapeutics Inc (1999–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Marker Therapeutics Inc from 1999 to 2024, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Marker Therapeutics Inc (MRKR) market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 84.3% | $18.56 Million | $22.02 Million | $3.46 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2023 | 82.0% | $14.05 Million | $17.13 Million | $3.07 Million | ▲ +25.1 pp |
| 2022 | 56.9% | $19.60 Million | $34.42 Million | $14.82 Million | ▼ -7.6 pp |
| 2021 | 64.6% | $43.99 Million | $68.14 Million | $24.15 Million | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2020 | 59.9% | $27.34 Million | $45.61 Million | $18.27 Million | ▼ -35.2 pp |
| 2019 | 95.1% | $44.09 Million | $46.36 Million | $2.27 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2018 | 95.5% | $59.34 Million | $62.14 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +24.9 pp |
| 2017 | 70.6% | $3.66 Million | $5.18 Million | $1.52 Million | ▼ -7.5 pp |
| 2016 | 78.1% | $6.18 Million | $7.92 Million | $1.74 Million | ▲ +399.5 pp |
| 2015 | -321.4% | $-21.36 Million | $6.65 Million | $28.01 Million | ▲ +134.6 pp |
| 2014 | -456.1% | $-1.02 Million | $224.45K | $1.25 Million | ▲ +10926.2 pp |
| 2013 | -11382.3% | $-8.77 Million | $77.03K | $8.85 Million | ▼ -5944.7 pp |
| 2012 | -5437.6% | $-5.67 Million | $104.21K | $5.77 Million | ▼ -4420.4 pp |
| 2011 | -1017.1% | $-3.46 Million | $340.21K | $3.80 Million | ▲ +1793.5 pp |
| 2010 | -2810.6% | $-3.27 Million | $116.43K | $3.39 Million | ▼ -2634.3 pp |
| 2009 | -176.3% | $-629.39K | $356.96K | $986.35K | ▲ +5538.0 pp |
| 2008 | -5714.3% | $-3.02 Million | $52.91K | $3.08 Million | ▼ -5114.2 pp |
| 2007 | -600.0% | $-1.67 Million | $279.11K | $1.95 Million | ▲ +1343.8 pp |
| 2006 | -1943.9% | $-3.00 Million | $154.34K | $3.15 Million | ▲ +526.4 pp |
| 2005 | -2470.3% | $-2.22 Million | $89.86K | $2.31 Million | ▲ +296.8 pp |
| 2004 | -2767.0% | $-2.44 Million | $88.19K | $2.53 Million | ▼ -2076.4 pp |
| 2003 | -690.7% | $-643.75K | $93.21K | $736.95K | ▼ -751.8 pp |
| 2002 | 61.2% | $465.83K | $761.43K | $295.60K | ▲ +526.4 pp |
| 2000 | -465.2% | $-561.95K | $120.79K | $682.74K | ▼ -369.9 pp |
| 1999 | -95.4% | $-141.42K | $148.28K | $289.71K | — |