NeuroMetrix Inc (NURO) — Net Asset Quality Index
NeuroMetrix Inc (NURO) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 93.4% as of March 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $15.32 Million minus total liabilities of $1.01 Million yields net assets of $14.31 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read NeuroMetrix Inc total liabilities for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
NeuroMetrix Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2002–2024)
This chart shows how NeuroMetrix Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 23 annual periods from 2002 to 2024. As of March 2025, the index stands at 93.4%, representing net assets of $14.31 Million against total assets of $15.32 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see NeuroMetrix Inc stock valuation.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for NeuroMetrix Inc (2002–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for NeuroMetrix Inc from 2002 to 2024, covering 23 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check NURO capital-intensive asset ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 93.4% | $14.31 Million | $15.32 Million | $1.01 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2023 | 93.8% | $20.09 Million | $21.42 Million | $1.33 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2022 | 94.7% | $23.36 Million | $24.67 Million | $1.31 Million | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2021 | 93.3% | $23.22 Million | $24.89 Million | $1.67 Million | ▲ +27.6 pp |
| 2020 | 65.6% | $5.25 Million | $7.99 Million | $2.75 Million | ▲ +28.9 pp |
| 2019 | 36.7% | $2.53 Million | $6.89 Million | $4.36 Million | ▼ -13.6 pp |
| 2018 | 50.3% | $6.10 Million | $12.11 Million | $6.02 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2017 | 52.3% | $5.02 Million | $9.60 Million | $4.58 Million | ▼ -7.6 pp |
| 2016 | 59.9% | $4.96 Million | $8.28 Million | $3.32 Million | ▼ -18.5 pp |
| 2015 | 78.3% | $12.56 Million | $16.03 Million | $3.47 Million | ▲ +48.6 pp |
| 2014 | 29.7% | $3.39 Million | $11.40 Million | $8.02 Million | ▼ -36.9 pp |
| 2013 | 66.6% | $7.19 Million | $10.80 Million | $3.60 Million | ▼ -14.3 pp |
| 2012 | 80.9% | $8.80 Million | $10.88 Million | $2.08 Million | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2011 | 78.0% | $11.09 Million | $14.22 Million | $3.13 Million | ▼ -9.6 pp |
| 2010 | 87.6% | $20.20 Million | $23.07 Million | $2.87 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2009 | 88.0% | $35.71 Million | $40.57 Million | $4.86 Million | ▲ +15.3 pp |
| 2008 | 72.8% | $22.83 Million | $31.38 Million | $8.55 Million | ▼ -10.1 pp |
| 2007 | 82.9% | $46.73 Million | $56.37 Million | $9.64 Million | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2006 | 77.9% | $43.41 Million | $55.71 Million | $12.30 Million | ▼ -6.6 pp |
| 2005 | 84.5% | $36.25 Million | $42.90 Million | $6.65 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2004 | 89.7% | $34.06 Million | $37.95 Million | $3.90 Million | ▲ +720.2 pp |
| 2003 | -630.4% | $-45.50 Million | $7.22 Million | $52.72 Million | ▼ -64.3 pp |
| 2002 | -566.1% | $-39.93 Million | $7.05 Million | $46.98 Million | — |