Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp (OCSL) — Net Asset Quality Index
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp (OCSL) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 46.4% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $3.10 Billion minus total liabilities of $1.66 Billion yields net assets of $1.44 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2007–2025)
This chart shows how Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2007 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 46.4%, representing net assets of $1.44 Billion against total assets of $3.10 Billion USD. Explore cash efficiency ratio of Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp (2007–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp from 2007 to 2025, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp (OCSL) total market value.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 48.8% | $1.47 Billion | $3.00 Billion | $1.54 Billion | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2024 | 46.5% | $1.49 Billion | $3.20 Billion | $1.71 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2023 | 47.1% | $1.52 Billion | $3.22 Billion | $1.70 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 47.1% | $1.25 Billion | $2.65 Billion | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2021 | 49.8% | $1.31 Billion | $2.64 Billion | $1.32 Billion | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2020 | 55.8% | $914.88 Million | $1.64 Billion | $725.83 Million | ▼ -7.1 pp |
| 2019 | 62.8% | $930.63 Million | $1.48 Billion | $550.41 Million | ▲ +7.5 pp |
| 2018 | 55.3% | $858.03 Million | $1.55 Billion | $693.42 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2017 | 53.7% | $867.66 Million | $1.62 Billion | $748.39 Million | ▲ +5.1 pp |
| 2016 | 48.6% | $1.14 Billion | $2.35 Billion | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2015 | 52.3% | $1.35 Billion | $2.59 Billion | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2014 | 55.4% | $1.48 Billion | $2.67 Billion | $1.19 Billion | ▼ -10.6 pp |
| 2013 | 66.1% | $1.37 Billion | $2.07 Billion | $703.46 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2012 | 65.1% | $903.57 Million | $1.39 Billion | $485.43 Million | ▲ +4.8 pp |
| 2011 | 60.2% | $728.63 Million | $1.21 Billion | $481.09 Million | ▼ -27.1 pp |
| 2010 | 87.3% | $569.17 Million | $651.93 Million | $82.75 Million | ▼ -11.4 pp |
| 2009 | 98.7% | $410.56 Million | $415.89 Million | $5.33 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2008 | 98.4% | $294.34 Million | $299.15 Million | $4.81 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2007 | 99.5% | $106.82 Million | $107.33 Million | $514.00K | — |