ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. (PMN) — Net Asset Quality Index
ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. (PMN) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 42.8% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $21.46 Million minus total liabilities of $12.27 Million yields net assets of $9.19 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. (PMN) liquidity interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2005–2024)
This chart shows how ProMIS Neurosciences Inc.'s Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2005 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 42.8%, representing net assets of $9.19 Million against total assets of $21.46 Million USD. Explore cash efficiency ratio of ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. (2005–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. from 2005 to 2024, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. stock valuation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 87.2% | $16.49 Million | $18.91 Million | $2.42 Million | ▲ +59.6 pp |
| 2023 | 27.6% | $3.75 Million | $13.62 Million | $9.87 Million | ▲ +47.0 pp |
| 2022 | -19.5% | $-1.82 Million | $9.38 Million | $11.20 Million | ▼ -51.4 pp |
| 2021 | 31.9% | $7.16 Million | $22.44 Million | $15.28 Million | ▲ +105.3 pp |
| 2020 | -73.4% | $-1.02 Million | $1.38 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -92.6 pp |
| 2019 | 19.2% | $398.12K | $2.07 Million | $1.68 Million | ▼ -19.8 pp |
| 2018 | 39.0% | $1.16 Million | $2.97 Million | $1.81 Million | ▼ -31.7 pp |
| 2017 | 70.6% | $1.53 Million | $2.17 Million | $637.45K | ▲ +63.5 pp |
| 2016 | 7.2% | $69.43K | $967.82K | $898.39K | ▼ -45.0 pp |
| 2015 | 52.1% | $599.98K | $1.15 Million | $550.76K | ▲ +119.4 pp |
| 2013 | -67.3% | $-198.23K | $294.54K | $492.77K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2012 | -67.2% | $-212.54K | $316.29K | $528.83K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2011 | -67.2% | $-216.25K | $321.81K | $538.06K | ▼ -129.7 pp |
| 2010 | 62.5% | $809.08 | $1.29K | $484.84 | ▼ -25.5 pp |
| 2009 | 88.0% | $4.67 Million | $5.31 Million | $634.39K | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2008 | 89.2% | $3.90 Million | $4.37 Million | $472.01K | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2007 | 87.0% | $8.45 Million | $9.71 Million | $1.26 Million | ▼ -8.5 pp |
| 2006 | 95.5% | $12.20 Million | $12.77 Million | $575.14K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 95.5% | $4.55 Million | $4.76 Million | $212.62K | — |