ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. working capital to net assets ratio. ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. (PMN) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 100.7% as of September 2025. Working capital of $9.25 Million (current assets of $21.46 Million minus current liabilities of $12.21 Million) is measured against net assets of $9.19 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. tangible equity quality to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. (2005–2024)
Working capital to net assets ratio of ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. from 2005 to 2024. This chart shows how ProMIS Neurosciences Inc.'s Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2005 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 100.7%, reflecting working capital of $9.25 Million against net assets of $9.19 Million USD. See ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. (PMN) liquidity interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2005–2024)
ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2005 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. from 2005 to 2024, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see ProMIS Neurosciences Inc. balance sheet assets.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 101.2% | $16.69 Million | $16.49 Million | $18.91 Million | $2.22 Million | ▼ -12.5 pp |
| 2023 | 113.8% | $4.27 Million | $3.75 Million | $13.62 Million | $9.35 Million | ▲ +150.1 pp |
| 2022 | -36.4% | $664.04K | $-1.82 Million | $9.35 Million | $8.68 Million | ▼ -332.9 pp |
| 2021 | 296.6% | $21.23 Million | $7.16 Million | $22.40 Million | $1.17 Million | ▲ +182.4 pp |
| 2020 | 114.2% | $-1.16 Million | $-1.02 Million | $1.24 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +26.3 pp |
| 2019 | 87.9% | $349.83K | $398.12K | $2.03 Million | $1.68 Million | ▼ -7.2 pp |
| 2018 | 95.1% | $1.10 Million | $1.16 Million | $2.91 Million | $1.81 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2017 | 95.9% | $1.47 Million | $1.53 Million | $2.11 Million | $637.45K | ▲ +97.0 pp |
| 2016 | -1.1% | $-763.00 | $69.43K | $897.63K | $898.39K | ▼ -88.3 pp |
| 2015 | 87.2% | $523.11K | $599.98K | $1.07 Million | $550.76K | ▼ -57.5 pp |
| 2013 | 144.7% | $-286.79K | $-198.23K | $205.99K | $492.77K | ▼ -7.0 pp |
| 2012 | 151.7% | $-322.39K | $-212.54K | $206.44K | $528.83K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 151.7% | $-328.01K | $-216.25K | $210.04K | $538.06K | ▲ +71.6 pp |
| 2010 | 80.1% | $648.27 | $809.08 | $1.13K | $484.84 | ▼ -13.2 pp |
| 2009 | 93.3% | $4.36 Million | $4.67 Million | $4.99 Million | $634.39K | ▲ +2.7 pp |
| 2008 | 90.6% | $3.53 Million | $3.90 Million | $4.00 Million | $472.01K | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2007 | 93.4% | $7.89 Million | $8.45 Million | $9.15 Million | $1.26 Million | ▼ -4.9 pp |
| 2006 | 98.3% | $11.99 Million | $12.20 Million | $12.57 Million | $575.14K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2005 | 98.4% | $4.47 Million | $4.55 Million | $4.69 Million | $212.62K | — |