Beeio Honey Ltd (WTS) — Net Asset Quality Index
Beeio Honey Ltd (WTS) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 13.7% as of June 2019. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of ILA1.87 Million minus total liabilities of ILA1.62 Million yields net assets of ILA256.00K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Beeio Honey Ltd liquidity resilience to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Beeio Honey Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2000–2018)
This chart shows how Beeio Honey Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2000 to 2018. As of June 2019, the index stands at 13.7%, representing net assets of ILA256.00K against total assets of ILA1.87 Million ILA. See Beeio Honey Ltd (WTS) liquidity to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Beeio Honey Ltd (2000–2018)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Beeio Honey Ltd from 2000 to 2018, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see WTS stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (ILA) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 19.2% | ILA703.00K | ILA3.65 Million | ILA2.95 Million | ▼ -25.3 pp |
| 2017 | 44.5% | ILA3.34 Million | ILA7.49 Million | ILA4.16 Million | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2016 | 47.6% | ILA3.67 Million | ILA7.71 Million | ILA4.04 Million | ▼ -5.9 pp |
| 2015 | 53.4% | ILA4.87 Million | ILA9.11 Million | ILA4.24 Million | ▲ +569.7 pp |
| 2014 | -516.2% | ILA-19.64 Million | ILA3.81 Million | ILA23.45 Million | ▼ -361.4 pp |
| 2013 | -154.8% | ILA-13.98 Million | ILA9.03 Million | ILA23.02 Million | ▼ -100.7 pp |
| 2012 | -54.1% | ILA-8.39 Million | ILA15.50 Million | ILA23.89 Million | ▼ -43.9 pp |
| 2011 | -10.2% | ILA-4.12 Million | ILA40.32 Million | ILA44.44 Million | ▼ -31.3 pp |
| 2010 | 21.1% | ILA11.25 Million | ILA53.26 Million | ILA42.01 Million | ▼ -9.9 pp |
| 2009 | 31.0% | ILA17.46 Million | ILA56.36 Million | ILA38.89 Million | ▼ -13.7 pp |
| 2008 | 44.7% | ILA36.76 Million | ILA82.19 Million | ILA45.43 Million | ▼ -16.0 pp |
| 2007 | 60.7% | ILA67.41 Million | ILA111.01 Million | ILA43.61 Million | ▼ -16.6 pp |
| 2006 | 77.4% | ILA76.86 Million | ILA99.36 Million | ILA22.49 Million | ▲ +24.2 pp |
| 2005 | 53.1% | ILA69.07 Million | ILA129.95 Million | ILA60.88 Million | ▲ +26.0 pp |
| 2004 | 27.1% | ILA40.26 Million | ILA148.53 Million | ILA108.26 Million | ▼ -39.7 pp |
| 2003 | 66.8% | ILA57.67 Million | ILA86.33 Million | ILA28.66 Million | ▲ +6.1 pp |
| 2002 | 60.7% | ILA82.42 Million | ILA135.85 Million | ILA53.43 Million | ▲ +13.7 pp |
| 2001 | 47.0% | ILA76.78 Million | ILA163.39 Million | ILA86.61 Million | ▲ +17.8 pp |
| 2000 | 29.2% | ILA71.26 Million | ILA243.82 Million | ILA172.56 Million | — |