Apollo Silver Corp (APGO) — Net Asset Quality Index
Apollo Silver Corp (APGO) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 98.5% as of May 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$57.51 Million minus total liabilities of CA$878.55K yields net assets of CA$56.63 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read APGO total liabilities for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Apollo Silver Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2001–2025)
This chart shows how Apollo Silver Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 25 annual periods from 2001 to 2025. As of May 2026, the index stands at 98.5%, representing net assets of CA$56.63 Million against total assets of CA$57.51 Million CAD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Apollo Silver Corp (APGO) total market value.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Apollo Silver Corp (2001–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Apollo Silver Corp from 2001 to 2025, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check APGO capital-intensive asset ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 97.7% | CA$33.20 Million | CA$33.96 Million | CA$767.63K | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2024 | 97.1% | CA$13.71 Million | CA$14.12 Million | CA$404.32K | ▲ +6.5 pp |
| 2023 | 90.6% | CA$3.54 Million | CA$3.91 Million | CA$365.54K | ▼ -6.7 pp |
| 2022 | 97.3% | CA$90.41 Million | CA$92.90 Million | CA$2.48 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2021 | 97.1% | CA$92.49 Million | CA$95.20 Million | CA$2.72 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2020 | 97.7% | CA$6.20 Million | CA$6.35 Million | CA$147.54K | ▲ +895.8 pp |
| 2019 | -798.1% | CA$-195.99K | CA$24.56K | CA$220.55K | ▼ -723.4 pp |
| 2018 | -74.7% | CA$-59.64K | CA$79.80K | CA$139.44K | ▲ +321.8 pp |
| 2017 | -396.5% | CA$-92.97K | CA$23.45K | CA$116.42K | ▼ -363.2 pp |
| 2016 | -33.4% | CA$-24.13K | CA$72.24K | CA$96.37K | ▲ +155.0 pp |
| 2015 | -188.4% | CA$-82.69K | CA$43.88K | CA$126.58K | ▼ -254.6 pp |
| 2014 | 66.1% | CA$113.83K | CA$172.11K | CA$58.28K | ▲ +34.1 pp |
| 2013 | 32.0% | CA$91.00K | CA$284.04K | CA$193.04K | ▼ -64.0 pp |
| 2012 | 96.1% | CA$2.54 Million | CA$2.64 Million | CA$103.92K | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2011 | 91.4% | CA$2.62 Million | CA$2.87 Million | CA$245.25K | ▲ +24.3 pp |
| 2010 | 67.1% | CA$178.06K | CA$265.26K | CA$87.21K | ▲ +74.7 pp |
| 2009 | -7.6% | CA$-134.47K | CA$1.78 Million | CA$1.91 Million | ▼ -27.4 pp |
| 2008 | 19.8% | CA$463.93K | CA$2.34 Million | CA$1.88 Million | ▼ -8.2 pp |
| 2007 | 28.1% | CA$737.41K | CA$2.63 Million | CA$1.89 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2006 | 28.2% | CA$789.88K | CA$2.81 Million | CA$2.02 Million | ▲ +27.3 pp |
| 2005 | 0.8% | CA$20.63K | CA$2.46 Million | CA$2.44 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2004 | -1.4% | CA$-42.53K | CA$3.00 Million | CA$3.04 Million | ▼ -35.6 pp |
| 2003 | 34.1% | CA$846.43K | CA$2.48 Million | CA$1.63 Million | ▼ -59.5 pp |
| 2002 | 93.6% | CA$252.71K | CA$269.91K | CA$17.20K | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2001 | 93.9% | CA$279.70K | CA$297.83K | CA$18.13K | — |